Richard Pratt/SourceMedia Group Admin Updated: 31 December 2012 | 6:30 am in conversations

Would a regional approach to economic development work best?


Related Stories


thegazette.com Copyright 2011 SourceMedia Group. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

The big question is this: Would the different government entities and economic-development agencies of the Corridor work better together?

The retired CEO of a major Cedar Rapids employer believes a merger of economic development organizations in the Corridor to form a single regional identity could happen “if we can get the right people together.”

Pat Baird, former president and CEO of AEGON USA (now Transamerica), facilitated a Nov. 19 meeting requested by investors of the Cedar Rapids Metro Economic Alliance and the Iowa City Area Development Group.

The goal of the meeting, which involved the executive committees and investors of both organizations, was to determine “how to be better together,” said Chuck Peters, ICAD board chairman. “We need to rethink how we do economic development.”

Baird said participants at that meeting primarily discussed whether thinking regionally is really a net win for the Corridor. “We asked two questions,” Baird said. “‘Can you do the same functions for less, or can you do more for the same? If we hold ourselves out as a region with more population, amenities and attractions, will we get noticed by more radar companies looking to locate somewhere?’

What do you think? Would promoting our region instead of individual communities be a better approach to economic and job development?

Rules of Engagement
  • Be truthful. more
  • Be civil. more
  • Be responsible. more
  • Own your words. more
  • Leave the trolls alone. more
  • Take commercial ads elsewhere. more
  • Know that comments will be moderated. more
  • Or what? more
Would a regional approach to economic development work best?
  1. I’m sorry, but Dubuque and to an extent Waterloo has been kicking rear and taking names. I’m not sure what they’re doing different (other than working), but it’s bringing them a lot of business and growth. I wonder if we have too many strings attached to anything we offer?

  2. What is needed is a combined national and regional approach to “reduce” the size and scope of government spending. The private sector, liberty and prosperity are being held hostage to pay for a bloated, wasteful and restrictive government. A government handout is NOT economic development or prosperity for anyone.

    • And who, Gary Ellis, oversees this combined national and regional approach? The Koch brothers? Wal-Mart? How ’bout Donald Trump.




Featured Jobs from corridorcareers.com