
Three of the four players in this picture will make up Iowa's QB race for 2012. No. 15 is redshirt freshman Jake Rudock. True freshman C.J. Beathard is No. 16 and junior Cody Sokol is No. 19. (Brian Ray/The Gazette)
QUICK LOOK BACK: New offensive coordinator Greg Davis came to town and made a bear rug out of James Vandenberg’s senior season.
OK, there was a bear rug, but a lot of people figured into seven total TD passes last season, including Vandenberg’s read on Davis’ newly installed passing system, an unsteady group of wide receivers and tight ends who didn’t come alive until the final third of the season. The performance squeezed wide receivers coach Erik Campbell out of a job (it had to be part of it). It also moved head coach Kirk Ferentz to hire Bobby Kennedy, Davis’ wide receiver coach from 2004 through 2010 at Texas.

Iowa sophomore quarterback Jake Rudock goes through warmups before the Purdue game last November. Offensive coordinator Greg Davis watches in the background. (Gazette file)
The numbers were disgusting. Iowa finished in the national 100s in passing offense (187.4 yards a game), TD passes (seven), yards per attempt (5.8), pass efficiency (107.72) and in completion percent on third downs between 4 and 6 yards (45.7 percent, which, if you think about the lean toward short passes last season, kind of says it all).
Perhaps the most striking metric doesn’t come with a number and has more to do with the overall aesthetics. What exactly where they trying to do in the passing game? The fact that there was no one finger to point should make you cringe going into ’13.
Maybe it’s as simple as Iowa isn’t Texas. Ferentz recently referenced a postseason meeting with Davis.
“I think the one thing that was really clear, Greg has a much better feel for where we’re at and who we are right now,” Ferentz said.
FOURTH DOWN — CONCERNS: There was a lot of static last season when James Vandenberg took every snap. Iowa was the only team in FBS to use one quarterback all season.
Several factors went into this. Iowa lost five of its eight games by a total of 16 points. The Hawkeyes fell apart in the other three. None of those are optimal times to insert a QB for his first college snaps.
The most disturbing conclusion is Iowa coaches didn’t think they had a QB they could put in the game. That’s disturbing because one of the three — sophomore Jake Rudock, junior Cody Sokol and redshirt freshman C.J. Beathard — will be the guy this year.
Would some junk throws in junk time of any game have meant much for a quarterback? Probably not. Vandenberg threw just eight passes in ’10 before throwing for 25 TDs (tied for third in single-season touchdown passes) and 3,022 yards (ranks No. 4 all-time). Ricky Stanzi threw just four passes in ’07 before guiding Iowa to a 9-4 record in ’08. Drew Tate threw just 11 passes as a sophomore before a first-team all-Big Ten season while leading Iowa to a share of the ’04 Big Ten title.
Brad Banks is the argument the other way. He threw 41 passes in ’01 to set his feet for a 2002 season where he ended Heisman runner-up.
Everybody throws their first pass some time. Iowa will have three QBs do it next season. Where could that show up? In Ferentz’s 15 seasons, QBs making their first starts at Iowa State’s Jack Trice Stadium are 2-6, with Nathan Chandler (’03) and Stanzi (’09) claiming the lone victories.
THIRD DOWN — ADDITIONS/SUBTRACTIONS: It can’t be repeated enough, but the problems with the passing game last season were systemic. It wasn’t one person, be that person quarterback, wide receiver/tight end or offensive coordinator. That’s not meant to bury blame. All three of those categories took hits on any given play and sometimes all three on the same play.
There’s no other reasonable hypothesis for Vandenberg going from one of the top five seasons ever for an Iowa QB to the fewest TD

Junior QB Cody Sokol goes through warmups at Indiana last season. "Goes through warmups" is the sum experience of all three Iowa QB candidates this spring. (Gazette file)
passes for an Iowa starter since 1999. That’s not saying Vandenberg, a sterling example of student-athlete, gentleman and guy you’d want to hang out with, wasn’t without his flaws.
His draft profile on NFL.com lists his weaknesses. You’re probably going to recognize a few of these:
Does not always set footwork, even on three step drops. Lacks composure to work through progressions, appears to lock on to a receiver and overthrows if they do not separate. Gets happy feet when that first read is not there, attempts to reset but those throws are consistently poor. Placement is not good despite consistent motion. Rarely puts touch on his passes, makes one-speed throws. Ducks when facing interior pressure at the release point. Tends to sail outside breaking routes rather than leading receiver.
Vandenberg’s NFL viability could move this argument one way or the other. He probably doesn’t get drafted, but he likely will get a shot to win a No. 3 spot in a camp.
Yes, John Wienke became the pooch punter and not the backup QB. Still, he went into Iowa football with sights on someday being a coach and he soaked it all in. He did know Davis’ system and that will be missed. One thing you have to say is Iowa did get plays into the game more efficiently last season.
Beathard comes online this fall. He’s a natural talent with a strong arm. He’s also maybe 185 pounds. Beathard led state of Tennessee in passing yards, completions and touchdowns as a junior and senior. He won a “team leader” award at the team banquet. Read into that what you will.
Sokol now has two years to play two years, so he’s in. Sokol is currently listed at 6-2, 205. Don’t be surprised if his weight is 215 or more. He’s pretty well put together. He had seven offers coming out of Scottsdale Community College, including Arizona and Maryland. Sokol threw for 3,807 yards, 43 touchdowns and 10 interceptions as a sophomore in 2011 for the Fighting Artichokes.
Incoming freshman Nic Shimonek (6-4, 205) likely will redshirt. Last season at Mildred (Texas) High School, he completed 176 of 279 (63.1 percent) for 2,718 yards and 35 touchdowns with 6 interceptions. He also had 811 yards rushing and 16 touchdowns on the ground in leading Mildred to a 13-2 record and an appearance in the Class 2A Division II state championship game at Cowboys Stadium.
SECOND DOWN — BATTLES BREWING: They don’t know who the QB will be. That’s the honest consensus gathered from a few sources around the program. The 2013 QB is totally up for grabs and the wildcard might be how the winner moves when it’s time to run.
The whole Davis system is based on quick decisions. After sifting through the variables of down and distance, Vandenberg said last fall that he was coached to edit out options in pre-snap.
“Coach Davis always talks about eliminating as many things at the line of scrimmage as possible,” Vandenberg said in this post. “You want to rule out all the places you can’t go. In the quick [passing] game, you rule out 95 percent of it and you’re playing something that you’re pretty sure is going to happen and if it doesn’t, the ball has to come down.”
Quick decisions, ball has to come down. Of course, the ball coming down means taking off and running, thus the Iowa QB of the future will need to take off and run. We’re not talking zone read, RGIII or Colin Kaepernick, but 4 yards here or 3 yards there would help move the chains.
When Davis was asked if Vandenberg was “locking on” to targets, he said, “The first thing that quarterbacks are taught to do is where are my protection problems because there’s always an opportunity for them to be in a protection situation, so that’s where everything starts. And then after that, there are various kinds of reads, whether or not we’re full‑field reading based on rotation or whether or not we’re in a progression kind of read. I haven’t felt like James was locking onto someone through the first five ballgames.
“The one thing that happens with a guy like James is that he does so much study during the course of the week, a lot of times he’s getting a pre‑snap tip as to what he feels like the defense is going to do, and that pre‑snap tip will, in some cases, eliminate progressions, so a lot of times he gets through his progressions pretty quickly.”
Going into the second season under Davis’ system for all three QB candidates, lack of knowledge can’t be an excuse. Knowledge of the system and mobility might be the first steps in slotting the three.
FIRST DOWN — WHAT COULD HAPPEN: Iowa coaches don’t know who the starter is right now. Let’s run through a few of the bits of info that have dropped here and there:
– Rudock (6-3, 200) moves better than you might think. Again, we’re not talking zone read kind of moves, but he pull it down and run. He should have the best working knowledge of the system. He was, after all, the No. 2 last season. What he learned will matter for him this year.
– Rudock is pre-med, a whip-smart student. He also modified his major last year.
– Sokol is the strongest of the three and has the most mature body. I’m not sure how well he moves with the ball. I haven’t heard anything in that area. He believes his arm and isn’t afraid to make mistakes, but that ended up in a few practice interceptions. That’s a fixable between now and August.
– Beathard might have the most raw talent. Vandenberg said this after Iowa’s season finale. In fact, here’s that breakdown: “I think Jake has kind of been groomed, very talented,” Vandenberg said. “You’ve got Cody, a juco who is the oldest and most mature guy in that room but who’s only been with us for a semester and a half now. And then C.J., who really has no idea what he’s doing yet, but you can see his natural talent. He can really throw the ball.” Beathard got the coaches’ attention last fall with a strong arm and excellent accuracy. Forget the 29-inch waist (I’m sure it’s thicker, but he is thin). Beathard has the arm to be in and maybe lead this race.
Quick decision making, knowledge of the system, mobility, accuracy. Throw leadership in somewhere, but tangible abilities probably trump intangibles when you were 4-8 last season and you have six months to find a starting QB.
Wow, Vandenberg’s weaknesses per nfl.com couldn’t be more accurate. However, I still place more blame on Davis’ offense. He still had those same glaring weaknesses in 2011, but his year was night/day compared to 2012. It’s only year 1 for Davis, but good grief, it appeared he adjusted absolutely nothing from game 1 to 12.
They always said they tried to adjust.
And that’s the really frustrating thing. You couldn’t tell what they were doing because none of it worked.
Davis, with Kirk’s stamp of approval, operated the most inept offense I’ve seen in Kinnick Stadium since the darkest days of Frank Lauterbur, who was to Iowa football what Todd Lickliter was to Iowa basketball.
How Ferentz could stand there and watch that week after week is inconceivable. Wisconsin’s offense bogs down for two games, and the brand new O-line coach is fired, Wisconsin finds an offense and goes to the Rose Bowl. Wisconsin plays to win. What is Ferentz playing for? Those are the facts, and they ain’t pretty for Iowa.
Usually your rants have a pretty good, valid point to them.
This is just a rant to have a rant.
I would be pretty surprised if the offense isn’t quite a bit better this year even with a first year QB. Actually I think the O-line and RB situation is pretty good and that always helps.
I like the RBs. There should be some great competition between Damon Bullock and Jordan Canzeri. Canzeri is perhaps the team’s hungriest player.
I think Brian Ferentz will find/build a solid five, but right now the inside trio is a work in progress. I think Blythe moves to center. Guards are up in the air a bit with Donnal coming off an ACL. I think Ryan Ward might surprise, but this OL will take some time to gel, especially on the inside.
“Vandenberg threw just eight passes in ’09 before throwing for 25 TDs (tied for third in single-season touchdown passes) and 3,022 yards (ranks No. 4 all-time).”
I hate to be nit-picky, but Vandenberg had to throw more than eight passes in 2009, playing in half the Northwestern game and the entire OSU game.
Sloppy mistake on my part.
Thanks for letting me know.
Is that a Blackhawks sweater?
The problems on offense last year, to me, came out of Ferentz and his inability to forego his run first mindset. If you track the offense from game 1 to the end, you will see that outside of 3/4 of the first game, the offense looked very much like a base of the pro set that Ferentz favors with some of what Davis likes to do. It certainly did not resemble anything that Davis had done in the past. Well, except for that first game against N. Illinois, when against a BCS Bowl team we ran spread, shotgun, no-huddle for a lot of the game. But, Vandy was sacked 6 times and that freaked out Ferentz and he meddled the offense into a crap show.
I do sense he has doubled down on Davis. If that really happens, if Kirk really lets Davis do what he wants, then it will be interesting to see which QB he goes with. I would bet on him choosing the most accurate of the group, because in quick read offenses you have to hit guys on the run, in stride, in the breadbasket. Vandy was TERRIBLE at that. I mean, just terrible. I bet Beathard gets the job if it is a truly open competition. But, again, with Ferentz and his past philosophy of letting the more mature guys get every chance in the world to start, you never know.
But, let’s put brackets around this upcoming season. This is a team bereft of proven big time playmakers. I don’t see how this team wins more than 3-4 games this year with that schedule. You hope guys breakout, but that’s not happened of late. We’ll see.
Iowa tried to address the playmaker deal in recruiting with five WR types and two quick backs. It has to hit on at least two (Powell and . . . Mitchell, maybe?). WRs I expect to contribute: Kevonte, Tevaun Smith and . . . I don’t know. Weisman had big runs last year. I’m thinking he’s more of an FB this year. Bullock and Canzeri, if used in space, could be intriguing players.
But I’m going to need to see playmakers to believe this team has consistent playmakers. Weisman is the closest they have coming back and that was a product of the OL’s pinnacle moments of 2012 (before the injuries).
I hope we hit with WR’s instead of RB’s. Even if we do get a hit on RB he will only be with us for .5-1.5 years before he leave anyway.
At least we have a huge stud in Greg Garmon…….oh wait he left after 1 year.
At least we have 3 Rb’s who stay healthy……….oh wait none of them have been healthy for 15 min in a row.
At least we have a bunch of 2 star recruits that no other Major conference team wanted or offered……….Wow, sometime its not good to be a hawkeye.
I guess I will save a couple hundred dollars a year not traveling back home to watch my yearly game as I thankfully skipped last year.
I never thought Garmon was going to be the guy. I’m not sure his best position as a Big Ten player was running back. We’ll see, though. I might be wrong.
I think you hit the nail on the head. And count me as one who doesn’t believe that the KF-Greg Davis marriage can work, their preferred styles are just too different in philosophy and priorities. But KF has doubled-down on the GD, going all-in with Davis’ type of players and assistants. If it works, then great; but, if we have another season like last year on offense, then KF might have lashed himself to a sinking ship and the S.S. Greg Davis will take Kirk down with him.
-
Hey Greg Davis and his “offense” is great, as long as he has better players than everyone else.
What, we expected him to be as good with 40-50th rated recruiting classes as he was with top 1- 5 classes??
With GD should it be offence instead of offense???
BTW great name: MAX POWER
I think Iowa’s focus on WRs and the slot RBs in recruiting back up your point, David. Iowa clearly was looking for the athletes to fit Davis’ offense.
Was it intentional that the 3rd down portion of this article went through the resumes of Weinke (last year), Beathard, and Sokol and skipped over Rudock? Not trying to be critical Marc, but just thought it was a strange progression of the article. Especially since Rudock has the glossiest resume.
If we are allowed to bet on this, I am still placing my wager on Rudock coming out on top.
Nothing against Vandenberg but I sure am hoping that last year was all his fault (lol). Because my fear is that Kirk showed the door to the wrong coach. Consider that under Campbell Iowa had two of its most prolific WR’s in school history and I don’t think they were the two most talented. Everyone apologize to Ken O’Keefe and beg him to come back.
The header there is “Additions/Subtractions.” Rudock was already here. Vandenberg and Wienke are leaving. Beathard and Sokol are eligible. That’s all that’s about.
Theoretically, Rudock has a leg up. As the No. 2 last season, he was the one most prepped for play.
Unfortunately, getting his helmet on in the fourth quarter against Minnesota was as close as he came.
Ok makes sense now. Sorry I didn’t connect the dots.
If they shove Weisman to fullback and don’t give him a chance to run te ball, I swear I am going to use language that I could not repeat on a battleship! The man was one of th few bright spots we had last year, and he has all the earmarks of being another Mike Alstott or Toby Gearhart. If he stays healthy and starts fro Day One, he could have 1,200 yards this year, and that would make the quarterback’s job a lot easier. Bullock has not shown me he can do that, and Canzeri is not an every down back. We need that tough, pounding running back, because we are not about to go with a spread offense at Iowa, not unless the pod creatures have replaced Kirk Ferentz with an alien with a gambler’s streak. Weisman for Heisman!
I know they love Weisman as an RB. I think that could evolve this year into a hybrid. He can run and he’ll be given a chance to compete with the other runners — Bullock, Canzeri and Malloy.
Can Iowa make a living by pounding the ball? If there’s one knock against Weisman it’s durability. I would expect him to be better prepared for the pounding this year. He at least has an idea.
Iowa wants an RB who can go the distance occasionally. That favors the other runners, but you know Weisman will have a role in this offense.
I don’t think inserting jake into the michigan game would have been “junk throws”. Also, there were other games where clearly vandy wasn’t on his game and rather than “play through his funk” the right move should have been to put in someone else. There seems to be a lot of finger pointing from last season – coaches, players, etc. However, I disagree that the problem was lack of talent or speed. Speed does not catch the ball or equate to running good sharp routes or timely throws. QB play (more than anything) lacked a competitive tension and that carried over to the team as a whole. Defensively there was competition, but you can only give the offense so many opportunities before you run out of faith. Until Iowa takes the stance that the best players play, I think you will see more slippage in games won. This stance needs to be across the board, with no player given “special privileges”. It is all about the team, and you have got to give each player “a shot” if they deserve it. If you don’t give them their shot and let someone else go on playing sub-par, then where is the motivation for the rest of the players to excel. Jake should have been given his shot – not junk throws, but given a chance to replace vandy in any game he wasn’t performing – there were plenty of those.
I really disagree with the whole “best players play” notion. A coach who plays someone because he likes the cut of their jib is a fired pretty fast coach.
I’ve had this argument a million times here. You’ll bring up Tanner Miller. I will ask who should’ve been ahead of him? And we will go around and around. If Rudock was better than Vandenberg, he would’ve played. I’m not at practice, and so I will defer to coaches on who plays. I would assume they play the best and not their favorite.
But if you bring up Collin Sleeper over Jordan Bernstein in ’11, I would say you have a point, and one that was quickly rectified (Castillo in the lineup, too, was a miss). I think if there is talent left on the bench in favor of a “special privileges” guy, that gets exposed quickly. Steele Jantz will never buy a beer in Ames because of that.
Iowa QB last year was Vandenberg and Rudock. Rudock would’ve had to clearly demonstrate higher performance than Vandenberg in practice. From everything I’ve heard and everything coaches have said, that never happened. If you know differently, then I defer.
Your overall point on competition is excellent and dead on.
I think lack of competition has stressed the defense. The O-line has tremendous competition and it’s routinely the best unit on the team. It certainly lacked at QB last season, but it won’t this year. Competition has to emerge on the DL or this team will scratch to make a bowl game.
Is the Steele Jantz cheap shot really necessary?
I’m sure there are B16 options for that comparison, like Michigan last fall. Remember when the Kiel kid was the next Heisman winner at ND.
Very lazy on your part.
The point of bringing up Jantz was because that performance exposed two players who shouldn’t have been starting, which is what my answer was about.
Michigan last fall exposed the defense in total.
I think you’re overlooking the huge difference between “starting” and “playing”. I don’t think there is anything to indicate that Rudock should have started over Vandy, but that doesn’t mean the failure to get him in the game in blowouts like Michigan and Penn State aren’t inexcusable, especially in the case of Michigan. In the Penn State game you could make the argument that KF was trying to let Vandy play his way out of his slump, by the Michigan game it was pretty clear that it wasn’t a slump, it was who he was as a player.
That’s a good point, Max.
Coaches have said Rudock wasn’t ready. I’ve heard nothing to the contrary. Real series and a real look against the opponent’s No. 1s would’ve been good. Taking snaps in the fourth quarter of the Michigan game, I’m not sure that would’ve furthered the cause.
I think a lot of folks wanted another vine to swing to when it became apparent JVB had flat lined.
Marc,
I do have a question about Iowa clawing for a bowl game. What 6 games do you have Iowa winning/have a chance to win? I have us down for 3 if we can split with the MAC teams. 1 MAC game, Div II team (Missu State) and I figure we split with Minn and Purdue. We lose to ISU and Northwestern when WE have much better players, so we will lose as the talent gets closer. MSU will be out for blood after last years game. OSU, NEB, MICH, WIS are one different planets than we are and it would be a miracle if we are in those games at HALF.
Where are the 6 wins comming from?
I think Iowa can beat NIU, Missouri State, Iowa State, Western Michigan, Minnesota, Purdue.
Iowa State will have a new QB in the rivalry and also loses the pillars of its defense in Klein and Knott. But ISU has a lot of bodies back on the DL and has an attack that is capable of opening Iowa’s defense like a tuna can.
Michigan State, Northwestern and Wisconsin can be winnable if there’s measured improvement in the passing game and the D-line finds five players who can do the job.
like most all on here I bleed Old Gold and Black. Its only spring, Hey we are undefeated (so far). So GO HAWKS!!!!!
Sorry my point was too complicated for you, Marc. You’re usually sharper than that. Maybe you should attack Iowa’s multi-millionaire coach the way you did me for simply pointing out that Wisconsin fires inept coaches while Iowa makes excuses for them and Wisconsin goes to Rose Bowls while Ferentz counts his cash. Is that clear enough?
Kirk Ferentz makes a lot of money, so he should win all the games.
Got it.
The post was about QBs, but you blow through that and go right to the dead horse that you’ve beaten into pulp.
Daaaaaaaang Its getting hot in here.
1. Sanji’s point was not too complicated for anyone
2. KF does not need to win every game, but I think he is paid for more than we’ve got over the last 4 years. I know that you seem to like him and think highly of him as a FB coach (thats fine but I dissagree). Even so 4-8 cannot happen with the resources (not including his contract) that he has. If it is talent, thats on him and his recruiting, if it is other coachs thats on him, if it is for punting on 4th and 4 from the 32 yard line and the punter kicks it out the back of the endzone thas on him for a stupid call.
3. You told me that KF does a good job of keeping the $$ supporters on his side which is going to save his job, but I think that most the fans that can’t drop 20-50K to help the team are done with him.
4. What does he do for those $$ droppers? Show up to their kids Birthday parties?
Gentlemen, gentlemen! Let’s try to be civil.
The QB choice should rightly be Greg Davis’ and not Kirk Ferentz’s. The head coach may of course overrule his OC, but as stubborn as KF can appear sometimes, I do not believe he would do that. To run the Davis system (which I really think he tried to hybridize with the Iowa system to get guys over the transitional hump, and it really did not work too well) you will need the kind of quick, strong-armed QB’s being recruited now, as well as the playmakers in the receiving corps that Iowa has not really had since Tim Dwight. I don’t like paying a lot of money for a .500 coaching record either, but like Marc said, it is beside the point of the post.
I hope Greg Davis can re-open the Texas recruiting market more fully, since we have all but given up on Florida as a recruiting ground. Those states are where the speed is. Speedy, sure-handed receivers make a QB look good. Slow guys who drop it a lot (as happened last year) do not. Vandy underthrew and overthrew a lot of passes, too, but it is a lot like when Chuck Long went to Detroit and they tried to get him to run the Red Gun offense. He was not in a system that played up his best attributes, and th result was predictable. He lost his job to Rodney Peete. But then, try putting Bessie the Mule in the Kentucky Derby sometime, and see how that ends. For that matter, put Secretariat behind a plow, and the same ugly result is likely. It is about personnel when you make these changes.
We will come back and win more than we lose once again, never fear. With some imagination, a little speed and the right style QB running the offense, we may win a lot more than that. We will see. In the meantime, Go Hawks!
Civil post = boring
Heated post = fun to read
I’ll be back later to see whats next, please keep it uncivil
Is uncivil a word?
Marc,
tough room today, I don’t remember people attacking you like this in the past……must have been a heck of an article. I cannot say that based on my reading it since I’m a Math teacher and I’m english retarded. You really got some emotion out of it which must be a good thing. Keep up the good work.
Also I like it when you jump in on these post, makes it must read
I the preseason previews would be touchy.
Iowa football is an exposed nerve right now. I can’t possibly be right about anything, but let’s push on to the RBs.