
The warring factions in the Cedar Rapids casino fight do agree on something.
Neither side plans to release any campaign finance information until it’s absolutely legally necessary. That’s 4:30 p.m.on Feb. 28, just days before the March 5 countywide referendum vote. And that report won’t cover any contributions or spending in the last 10 furious days.
“Right now, we don’t have any plans to release the filings before the deadline,” said Sam Roecker, spokesman for Just Say No Casino and associate of LinkStrategies, the Des Moines firm handling the campaign’s communications and fundraising.
“No, we’re just going to file according to the deadline requirements,” said Marcia Rogers,” spokeswoman for Vote Yes Linn County.
Such heartwarming unity. And yet, there’s been so much bickering about disclosing this or that, I figured more disclosure would be just what we need.
Just Say No demanded that Vote Yes disclose the names of casino investors. This week, most of those investors, 58 of them, were named. A welcome ray of sunshine, but not the same as having hard numbers on who is giving exactly how much to push the referendum to passage.
Then you have Just Say No, which wants to have it both ways in the disclosure game. Opponents demand the names of casino investors, while refusing to say, now, who is giving how much to defeat the casino. They’re also trying hard to convince us that local folks passionately warning us of the evils of gambling are entirely separate from the no campaign’s Des Moines operation, which is getting bucks from current casino operators fearing competition. How much? Who knows?
Whether you see that as a broad coalition or an unholy alliance, we’re not going to see the details from either camp until the referendum campaign is all but over.
It’s a lousy way to run a democracy. State laws should be changed. Voters deserve to know early and often who is paying for pricey efforts to win their votes. We’re tired of guessing games.
But there’s nothing in those campaign finance laws that says campaigns can’t release finance reports at any time they please. They could show voters today. Instead, they’ll dump the goods just before a vote and hope the lateness of the hour mutes the splash.
I guess that’s what passes for smart strategy. Keeping voters dumb for as long as possible. I say disclose the numbers and let the chips fall where they may.
The important question is whether a casino is right for Linn County? We can’t control who favors or opposes the casino, why the favor or oppose, or how they spend their money. I do know that the hundreds of volunteers (not being paid by anyone) I work with are the same people I worked with in the 1990′s to defeat the riverboat, and again to defeat the casino initiative in 2003. And I’ve met a lot of new friends during this campaign who are opposed to a casino for the right reasons, of which there are many. Regardless of whose involved – on either side of this issue, I know a casino will not contribute to economic development (no new money coming to town), because most money will be spent/lost by local Linn County residents. The casino proponents own research backs this up with $18 million of the projected $80 million in casino revenue coming from other regional casinos. Where does the other $62 million come from? Linn County residents. The result is a transfer of money from one group (casino customers) to another (casino owners, state and federal taxes). Here is a fact that no one can dispute – a dollar spent or lost at the casino is a dollar that won’t be spent at another Linn County business.
If there’s a good reason in all that for not releasing campaign finance info before the deadline, I can’t find it. I understand your side wants the focus to be on the grassroots. I’d just like to see who is watering the lawn, sooner than later.
By the same logic we should not have the kernels or the rough riders. Why is it that gambling is judged so much more harshly than other forms of entertainment?
And as a matter of”fact”, your fact is very disputable and obviously wrong. People will travel to gamble, money they spend at the casino would not have otherwise been spent here. Some money spent there may be taken away from other forms of entertainment or other merchants, but to say all is a complete falsehood. And to day it is atransfer of wealth from one group to another is, well, the same as any other business.
I guess I just don’t get the uproar, you may think casinos are stupid and wasteful, but in essence, most forms of recreation are. Casinos are not a productive enterprise but neither are drinking establishments, sports, comedy clubs, churches, etc.