We’ve seen some pretty big turning points in the effort to gain and cement marriage equality. There was the Iowa Supreme Court ruling in 2009, the ouster of three justices in 2010 before voters finally stopped the judge hunt this past fall. Democrats held the state Senate by the skin of their teeth twice, halting the push for a constitutional ban, perhaps permanently.
What happened yesterday in Des Moines may not look as “big.” But I think it’s pretty significant. From Radio Iowa:
About 30 Iowa Republicans met early tonight in Des Moines, the beginning of a more public effort to get the GOP to embrace marriage rights for same-sex couples.
Dave Kochel, Mitt Romney’s 2012 Iowa campaign manager, has been involved in Iowa political campaigns since 1982 and Kochel acknowledged he usually operates behind-the-scenes.
“But I think there comes a time for everybody where, particularly for me on this issue, you need to step to the front of the room,” Kochel said.
Kochel was joined by Ken Mehlman, a former chair of the Republican National Committee who headed George W. Bush’s Iowa campaign in 2000. He’s also one of the nation’s most prominent gay Republicans. And that’s not all:
Tom Synhorst, a former aide to Senator Chuck Grassley and Bob Dole’s 1988 Iowa Caucus campaign manager, was there, as was Eric Woolson, the manager of Mike Huckabee’s 2008 Iowa Caucus campaign. Woolson also served as Republican Govenor Terry Branstad’s press secretary in the mid-1990s.
Also on hand was Kathy Potts, a Cedar Rapids GOP activist and former county party chair. She backed Rick Perry’s presidential campaign. The meeting was sponsored by Republicans for Freedom, the group started by former state GOP Sen. Jeff Angelo in an effort to convince GOP members that marriage equality is a conservative value.
The Iowa Republican also has coverage:
As for those “values voters” that Mehlman organized in 2004 to vote for George W. Bush, he says supporting same-sex marriage is supporting family values.
“You’re seeing it across Iowa,” Mehlman said. “It makes a society stronger. It makes it more caring. It makes it more focused on the long term. It creates stability in the lives of children across this country who are raised by two members of the same gender who are loving moms or loving dads and because of what happened in Iowa, now have stability and an ability to know that their home is more secure.”
Is the Republican Party going to do a 180 on this issue tomorrow? No. But more and more Republicans, including these top-notch strategists, are beginning to say, openly, that the GOP’s stand against equality is out of step with they nation they seek to govern. And that’s a problem.
The bigger step will come when top elected leaders, people who have to face voters, start speaking out. My Linn County Supervisor, Brent Oleson, was among the first to join Angelo’s group. That took guts. We need more Republicans with guts.
Before we parade every conservative out, in favor of gay marriage, I would love to see a voter exit poll that surveys minority democrat voters to see where they stand on the issue. Is it asking too much of our reporters to actually compile a credible survey? I would be interested in hearing how Hispanics, Asians, African Americans, Middle Easterners and others whom generally vote for the democrats feel about the issue. How many are one issue voters?
Although I’m not as noteable as Kathy Potts, I am also a conservative who doesn’t care whom you marry. In fact, let me cast the first vote in a long awaited survey. Thank you.
2012 exit polls showed support for gay marriage among Latino and black voters.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/11/12/african-americans-and-latinos-play-big-role-in-gay-marriage-revolution/
And here’s a poll roundup from Pew detailing regional and minority support.
http://www.people-press.org/2012/11/09/behind-gay-marriage-momentum-regional-gaps-persist/
That’s just from some quick searching. Maybe others will find more data.
You’re certainly not alone, Sue. According to Fox’s exit poll, 25 percent of voters who backed Romney back legal same-sex marriage. And thank you.
Todd’s comment should give you a clue: Actually do a minimal amount of research before you post an “I would love to see” ( or ” I wish” ) comment. It very well may have already been done.
I appreciate the links, if not to further my point but perhaps it will reflect the columns we read.
Maybe this is an issue we can put in a time capsule, soon.
This is a corrective action done to try to preserve the relevance and viability of the GOP as a national political force. It’s not that the GOP is so out of touch with current society on this one issue: they are out of touch with society on a whole raft of issues, this being just one of them. “Coming around” to a more reasonable/moderate position on the GM issue will inevitably cost the party a certain number of far right-wing adherents (locally manifested as the Grifter Bob faction); however I’m sure that the calculus is that this loss will be much more than offset by the many more who will be attracted to vote for Republican candidates with a less irrationally xenophobic platform than has been recently seen.
As we have seen with the recent Senate activity on immigration reform, the GOP is moving in other areas to slough off problematic voter blocs and move closer to the political center. Whether this marks a true change of heart on the part of the Republican Party or is just a tactic to garner more votes through obfuscaton remains to be seen.
The GOP went through a similar basic-value transformation in the late 1960′s in the wake of southern desegregation: in the space of a decade, the Dems and Reps largely swapped positions on civil rights matters, and consequently the southeastern USA went from being known as the “Solid (Democrat) South” to being a contiguous group of Red States.
Without a sea change like this, the national GOP has little hope of ever winning the Presidency again. This would be a very bad thing, since the GOP is still strong within many states and its inability to be electable at the national level will only lead to ever-greater resentment toward the federal government on the part of its members.
Right on Jack, but I as an independent voter seriously see the repubs as mostly out of touch with most of what we voters want to see happening. They are now in free fall distruction because of the pressure of their minority which seems to have the party in a very bad position. I think the nation needs a 2 party system to keep viable, so let’s hope the repups can somehow get their serious people to keep the faith so we cn keep moving forward.
Homosexual marriage is legal in Iowa, Wonder why this is news? A quick perusal of the major media shows nothing about todays report that shows the nations economy has contracted by .1%.
Homosexual marriage
Gabby Giffords congressional testimony on guns (written by her physical therapist) Shes an expert??
illegal aliens being granted amnesty……again
30 million less workers in the labor force than 4 years ago
Enjoy all these very important things as you watch your assets and savings disappear into the economy you voted for. Right now the Dems have only one goal. Destroy the Republican Party,
That the nations and its citizens go down the economic drain while the Dems fixate on politics is just collateral damage. Break millions of nest eggs to make a political omlette
Just to comment on one piece of nonsense in your post: The .1% contraction I heard mentioned on several newscasts and it was discussed on the Public Television News Hour Wednesday evening and also on the Public Television Nightly Business report last (Wed.) night. If you don’t believe it just go to their websites and you should be able to access the transcripts, if not yet, soon.