Whether or not you like the additions of Maryland and Rutgers to the Big Ten, at least they can produce something that can be good for everybody.
1. The conference can go to football divisions based on geography, not nonsense.
2. The division names can be called West and East instead of Legends and Leaders.
I don’t know how Purdue and Indiana would feel about being in separate divisions, but you have to break a few eggs to make a Bob Evans omelette, and there are 18 Bob Evans locations in the Greater Indianapolis area.
How could things be any more sensible than Iowa being in the same division as Wisconsin and Illinois, and vice versa? Michigan and Ohio State should be in the same division. So should Northwestern and Illinois.
So just do it, Big Ten, and don’t ask questions. Maryland, Rutgers and Penn State need to be together in the East. This couldn’t be simpler. Purdue and Indiana are split up, but you make sure they play each other every year, and everybody’s happy.
The whole thing makes total sense economically from a travel standpoint, for teams and their fans. Basketball should be carved into the same divisions. The fewer trips Nebraska has to make to Maryland, and vice versa, the greater the savings for everyone.
As for Legends and Leaders, I don’t see the Big Ten shedding those names casually. But it should, anyway. If this is a conference based on 14 fine academic institutions, clarity and correctness should be the aim. West is west, East is east.
Plus, the geographic setup would ensure Nebraska wouldn’t play Wisconsin in any Big Ten football title-games after next season. The league doesn’t need any more 70-31 scores in its championship.
Now, if the Big Ten adds schools in California or Texas or Georgia or Guam in the next year or so, well, someone else will have to figure out this important stuff.
The Big Ten says it wants your input, so click here to offer it.
Mike, I like it. Its seems to me to be the only way to go unless 2 more teams come in then it depends.
I like the (likely inadvertatent) snub of Wisconsin by leaving them off your graphic
In all honesty though, amen to having them back as a division rival.
Hey Mike,
You got this right, as usual. The BIG and Mr. Delany’s hubris brought the league nothing but derision the first time they tried this. They can erase it by going with OPTION 2, although Wisconsin might wonder what’s going on since the folks at the BIG listed them not at all, but listed Minnesota twice. Ouch. I guess those folks at the BIG still are a long way from perfection.
I wasted 10 minutes of my life hitting the link and submitting my choice and my comments over on the BIG site. The honchos ignored us last time, much to their embarrassment, so I guess we can hope that even BIG Jim and the gang can admit how wrong they were and get it right this time. Maybe those of us who pay the BIG’s bills, fill the seats and watch the BTN will finally have a say in all this. But I’m not holding my breath.
Well said, Mike. In addition to the geographically incorrect divisions,Legends and Leaders are the most ridiculous names they could have come up with. I would have prefered Rustbelt and Farmbelt. Besides, about half of the schools in the Midwest are named North, South, East, West or Central.
I’m not going to bother to sent my imput to the B$G because Dictator Delaney makes all of the conference’s decisions. If he doesn’t like it, forget it.