
(AP Photo)
Warning: Satire.
A phone rings.
Addiction studies institute, may I help you?
“Yeah, I’d like to talk to someone about a habit I’m having a hard time kicking.”
You can speak with me, sir. I’m here to help. What’s the trouble?
“Well, I’m afraid I might be addicted to being governor. Governor of Iowa.”
Uh, well, I see. Isn’t that up to the voters?
“Oh, they won’t stop me. They never stop me. They love me! Or like me. Or find me completely acceptable. In any event, I’m undefeated, although the people who ran against me haven’t exactly been political titans. The last guy was like some evil genius double agent sabotaging his own governorship from the inside. It was nuts. So I just keep winning and winning.
“I love Iowa so much. But is it possible to love something too darn much?”
Yes. Yes it is. Have you ever tried quitting?
“Sure, I served four terms and then gave it up, cold turkey. I got some ‘executive power patches’ from the National Governor’s Association for those times when I got cravings to veto something, mobilize the National Guard, etc. I was president of a medical school, so I had a really big desk, which helped. And people still called me governor, which was nice.
“But then my so-called friends begged me to come back and save the party from some crazy Dutchman. They pulled me back in. And I won, of course. I always win.
“The plan was to put an elder statesman’s steady, but presumably temporary, hand on the tiller to right our ship of state in turbulent times. But then I got in there. I started cutting budgets and issuing executive orders and clashing with union bosses. I was vetoing fuzzy-headed liberal stuff like tax credits for the poor and handing out big ‘oil business incentives and holding lofty policy summits. It was like, bang! The adrenaline kicked in. I’m back!
“And now I’m the longest-serving governor ever, right? Pretty sweet. Then I read online about this guy in New York, George Clinton, who served as governor from 1777-1795 and again from 1801-1804. That’s 21 years! But hey, I figure the states weren’t even technically united yet, so he doesn’t really count, right?”
Yeah, he sort of does.
“You’re not helping!
“Anyway, now I’m raising big bucks and getting ready to run for a sixth term. Six! I’ve been in office 6,542 days already. If I win, a 30-year-old guy who voted for me in 1982 will be on Medicare by the time I leave office. I’m humbled that the voters admire my hardworking consistency, but jeez Louise, would some change kill ya? If Sen. Tom Harkin and I run and win in 2014, together, with Sen. Chuck Grassley, we’ll have won 96 years in office between the three of us? Seriously?
“I love that my party has such loyalty and confidence in me. But come on, folks. Where’s the ambition?”
Have you thought of doing something else?
“Sure. I considered mounting an effort to remove Illinois from the union. Don’t get me started. I thought about opening a factory that makes those big ribbon-cutting scissors. You’d be shocked at the lack of craftsmanship in today’s ceremonial scissors. I’ve also pitched my memoirs. But just when I get to the dramatic part about phasing out the property tax on industrial machinery and equipment, it seems like publishing agents always get emergency text messages. Odd.”
Maybe the other party will field a strong candidate and beat you.
“Oh, man. Coffee just came out of my nose. Straight out of my nose! You gotta warn me. That was hilarious.”
Well, look on the bright side. So you win. It’s just four more years. Get it out of your system. It’s not like you’re going to run for a seventh term, right? Heh, heh. Right? Hello? Hello?”
Maybe I’m losing it, but I could swear that when I read this column this morning, there was a thinly-veiled reference to Bob Vander Plaats as a “crazy Dutchman” from whom Branstad’s last candidacy saved us. It appears that this has since been edited out, and for good reason: it would be unconscionable to link the many ethnic Dutchmen (crazy or otherwise) in this state with the likes of Grifter Bob.
You’re losing it — 11th paragraph down, above. ( I’ve heard tell the 1 or 2 Dutch who read the Gazette are marching on same. )
Yep, there it is… but I swear that a Ctrl-E search on “dutchman” mid-yesterday afternoon did not show anything… maybe a little dynamic editing/un-editing by The Gazette? (Sure, I’m paranoid… but am I paranoid enough?)
An ignominious piece from an ignominious writer.
Is Branstad’s additiction to running for Governer any different than Todd’s addiction to writing specious opinions? I could have had some fun with making parallel points but why bother …
who really cares either way?
Apparently one man’s specious opinions is another man’s ROTFL humor. Sort of like the conservative definitions of Humor and Tragedy: To a conservative, humor is when a liberal breaks a leg; tragedy is when a fellow conservative breaks a leg.
Keep up the good work, Todd. You seem to be at your best when you are jabbing a sharp stick in the fat ribs of state government elected officials. Yeah, it’s low-hanging fruit but none the less hilarious.
I’ve been having this nagging feeling that perhaps Branstad is considering another run not because he’s addicted to being governor, but because the Iowa Republican Party might not have anyone else capable of winning statewide office.
When Branstad decided not to run in 1998 his replacement was Jim Ross Lightfoot. When he decided to run again in 2010, his primary challenger was Bob VanderPlatts. The winner of the Iowa Straw Poll in 2012 was Michelle Bachman. The winner of the Republican Caucus in 2010 turned out to be Rick Santorum after all the votes were finally counted.
It could be that the Iowa Republican Party is as compromised and brand damaged as the National. Whatever else Branstad may be, he’s an opportunist, not an ideologue. Unless he’s gone completely senile, Branstad is not going to waste political capital bashing Gay people or promoting “life begins at conception”
No, but he will appease the right wing by helping make it harder for felons who have served their time and paid their debt from regaining their voting rights. That sort of thing resonates with the far right, and it does not cost the governor many votes. It just runs roughshod over people who don’t deserve it and is a despicable piece of political theatre besides. In his way, Branstad is no better than Grifter Bob. “Addicted to guv”? Well, one part of that song is right, anyway: “The lights are on… but he’s not home…”. Those would be the lights in his soul.