Mike Hlas

Hi, I'm Gazette/TheGazette.com sports columnist Mike Hlas. This is the Hlog. We will meet here, discuss things, and then go [...]
Updated: 28 November 2012 | 7:02 am in Sports, The Hlog by Mike Hlas

North Carolina and Virginia in the Big Ten? Not so fast, say both

But people say a lot of things


thegazette.com Copyright 2011 SourceMedia Group. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

UPDATE! MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE IS MOVING TO CONFERENCE USA!!!!!!

Conference realignment fever seemed to be under control for several months. But the fever is burning again, and it’s running wild across several conferences.

The Big Ten plucked (if “plucked” is the right word) Maryland and Rutgers last week. Thus, panic was reborn, the panic that the major conferences need to add schools and add them fast, lest they be left behind as a minor-players in college sports if not picked apart completely.

An amusing little sidebar came Tuesday when the Big East added the Big Easy (Tulane) for all sports and East Carolina for football only, both effective in 2014,

Another entertaining item was the fact the ACC was suing Maryland for the full $52.2 million exit fee the school owes the conference for leaving.

What else is going on? Well, ESPN reported early Wednesday morning that the ACC is going to vote to add Louisville. If that comes to fruition, there’s the replacement for Maryland. And it leaves the Big East with another vacancy.

Cincinnati wants into the ACC. So does Connecticut. There, they could hang out with its old Big East pals, Pittsburgh and Syracuse. But does the ACC want them? Not necessarily.

Virginia, meanwhile, claims it is standing firmly behind the ACC and isn’t interested in slipping off to the Big Ten.

He talked about with me on my Monday podcast, and on Tuesday, Lee Barfknecht of the Omaha World-Herald put it into publication. The Big Ten may be eyeing a grab of North Carolina and Kansas.

Kansas’ student newspaper says the school should bid the Big 12 adieu and hook up with the Big Ten. North Carolina Athletic Director Bubba Cunningham, however, said this in an email to UNC fans on Tuesday:

From @nicholsmj on Twitter

“Carolina is a charter member of the Atlantic Coast Conference and we believe the ACC is the finest conference in the nation. The ACC has been our home for nearly 60 years and we want it to be our home for another 60 years at least. Our speculating on what other league may be better for the Tar Heels would not be productive. We are part of a great league with a strong future and we know that the ACC leadership is serious in its efforts to strengthen the conference and position it for long-term success.”

If the ACC seems set up to hold together for the unforseeable future, maybe North Carolina will hold tight. What am I saying? This is major-college sports we’re talking about.

But, there is a demand for outsiders to get into the ACC. Connecticut wants in. So does Louisville, which couldn’t successfully romance the Big 12 not long ago.

Meanwhile, how about the Big 12, currently at 10 members? Would the league be interested in Florida State and Clemson if those two got fed up with the ACC’s football mediocrity? Does Bob Bowlsby’s conference feel good about its chances to keep its current 10 members in tow and is it confident enough to not try to expand to keep up with the Joneses?

Meanwhile, the Big East continues to desperately try to position itself as some sort of a major conference. Boise State and San Diego State say they’re still coming aboard. Also committed to doing so are Houston, SMU, Memphis and UCF, all currently in Conference USA. Navy will join for football in 2015.

“We’re not finished,” Big East Commissioner Mike Aresco said. “We obviously have some other plans for expansion.”

The winner of Thursday night’s Louisville-Rutgers game will almost surely represent the league in the Orange Bowl. Rutgers is in the Big Ten in 2014. Louisville hopes it is somewhere else, too.

Weird, wild stuff.

A footnote: If the Big Ten added Kansas and North Carolina on top of Maryland and Rutgers? No one will ever mistake Big Ten football for the product the SEC displays.

 

Rules of Engagement
  • Be truthful. more
  • Be civil. more
  • Be responsible. more
  • Own your words. more
  • Leave the trolls alone. more
  • Take commercial ads elsewhere. more
  • Know that comments will be moderated. more
  • Or what? more
North Carolina and Virginia in the Big Ten? Not so fast, say both
  1. Mike:

    Any discussion of schools leaving the Big 12 should also include of a discussion of how such departure would circumnavigate the Grant of Rights all ten schools recently signed. Every school signed away their TV rights to the conference for (I believe) the next 5-6 years.

    I am not aware of any other conference in the country where the members are handcuffed so strongly to it. Sure, Kansas could leave the Big 12 for the Big Ten, but the TV rights (and money) to all their games would stay with the Big 12 for the next six years. This is different than conference bylaws or an exit fee — it’s much stronger and much more enforceable.

    I don’t see the conference allowing one of their premiere members to leave — Kansas basketball is a cash cow and they know it. No one is voluntarily letting them out of their Grant of Rights.

    The only schools I could possibly see the Big 12 ripping up the Grant of Rights for would be Iowa State and Baylor. Possibly Oklahoma State and Kansas State, too. These schools do not have national brands or followings and don’t bring a lot to the table, TV market wise. They could likely be replaced by another school that brings a new or bigger TV market to the table.

    The Big 12 will never let UT, OU, TTU, TCU, WVU, and KU out of their Grant of Rights — they’re too valuable.




Featured Jobs from corridorcareers.com