EAST LANSING, Mich. — When the world ends and planet earth is a frozen cue ball in space, there will be cockroaches and there will be Hawkeyes.
Iowa had it when it needed it in a 19-16 double-overtime victory Saturday before 70,211 fans at Spartan Stadium. Michigan State (4-3, 1-2 Big Ten) controlled tempo behind monster running back Le’Veon Bell. The Spartans defense kept Iowa’s offense crumpled most of the day, allowing just 12 yards on 13 carries in the first half.
On the road, against the Big Ten’s best defense, in the rain, into a decent southerly wind, after sputter city for 3 1/2 quarters, facing a first-and-24 after a clipping penalty and trailing 13-6, the Hawkeyes (4-2, 2-0) found it when they needed it, when they hadn’t had it all day.
Running back Mark Weisman’s right ankle ended up in a walking boot in the postgame, but he scored a 5-yard TD to tie the game 13-13 with 55 seconds left. Mike Meyer’s 42-yard field goal in the second overtime ended up winning it.
“Everything went right,” said Meyer, who went 4-for-4 in a game where every point mattered. “It was a great snap and a great hold.”
It took 60 minutes and two OTs, but everything did finally go right for Iowa.
The Hawkeyes found it when the offense faced a first-and-24 from its own 18, needing a TD to tie the game. They found it on a second-and-26 during the drive. They found it in the end, when defensive tackle Louis Trinca-Pasat stuck his left hand in the air and just flicked an Andrew Maxwell pass that went through Keith Mumphery’s hands and into Iowa cornerback Greg Castillo’s arms.
“I didn’t know what to do at first,” said Castillo, a fifth-year senior who started because junior B.J. Lowery didn’t make the trip. “It took a second for it to sink in.”
Take a second, let this one sink in.
Hawkeyes sprinted onto the field. Hawkeyes skipped over to the corner of Spartan Stadium to celebrate with fans who made the trip. Hawkeyes rattled the rafters of a cramped lockerroom with a fast and furious rendition of the school fight song.
Iowa quarterback James Vandenberg threw an interception on the game’s first possession. Bell, who rushed 29 times for 140 yards, tromped in from the 14. Dan Conroy kicked a 24-yard field goal and the Spartans led 10-0 early in the second quarter.
Meyer kicked field goals of 23 and 28 yards to keep the Hawkeyes alive. And then finally — in the fourth quarter, after eight Iowa punts and seven three-and-outs — a shear of light.
First-and-24, second-and-26, they found it.
Vandenberg completed a 35-yard pass to wide receiver Keenan Davis for a first down on the second-and-26 play. Vandenberg finished with 134 passing yards, so 26 percent of his total yardage came on this play.
“I felt it turn when it was first-and-25,” Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz said about the set up to the final drive. “Oh boy, that’s not good. Huge play, and we didn’t make many big plays today, but huge play by James and Keenan.”
You know how quarterbacks and receivers always talk about “windows” to describe the moment when a receiver breaks open. This wasn’t a window as much as it was a mail slot.
“It wasn’t really a big window, but it was a window we had to get through,” said Davis, who caught six passes for 65 yards. “It was a play we had to make, something we had to do.”
Then, on third-and-6 from Michigan State’s 45, Iowa offensive coordinator Greg Davis went all the way back to week 1 and called a zone run to the left. Weisman broke through for a 37-yard gain to MSU’s 8. Then, he suffered an ankle injury on his 5-yard TD run on third down that tied it.
“Maybe it caught them off guard,” Weisman, who finished with 26 carries for 116 yards, said about the 37-yarder on third down. “Maybe not . . . I think it was the offensive line. They set the edge out there. They make it easy.”
If the Davis completion and Weisman runs were shears of light, the rest of it for Iowa was a series of low percussions.
Iowa won the overtime toss and forced MSU into a field goal on its possession in the first OT. Iowa settled for Meyer’s 27-yarder when Vandenberg threw incomplete to running back Greg Garmon on third down, making it 16-16.
Iowa gained one yard in the second OT possession. Meyer saved the Hawkeyes with his 42-yarder.
“I think the greatest piece of advice I’ve gotten was when Nate Kaeding [former all-American kicker at Iowa now with the San Diego Chargers] told me to treat every kick like it was a Super Bowl-winning kick,” said Meyer, who’s made 14 of 15 this season. “I take that mentality into everything.”
Trinca-Pasat’s left hand, probably a fingertip, was the final low percussion. It led to the end of Michigan State’s world.
“I think we have to look at where we are as a program right now and what’s the next step for us,” MSU coach Mark Dantonio said.
Iowa danced with its fans in the corner of Spartan Stadium. The Hawkeyes were the survivors on this cold, wet cue ball.
What can I say…. Pathos to Bathos!!! Great effort – improving defense. I think the offense needs to use the roll out and instill bootleg plays with play action if it is going to be a contender from here on out. I hope Mr. Weisman’s bruise is a 3-4 day recovery – I bet the trainers are all over him as I write this. Great game management – we outdid d’Antonio. I cannot imagine what he is going through right now… another Lansing lottery win.
Weisman not on two deep, but you probably know that by now.
That’s not a “out” but it’s probably a “doubtful.”
First, Marc, congrats on nailing the score: Your 19-16 prediction was worthy of the great seer…except, of course, you got the teams backward.
But thanks for a great story. It does a great job of capturing the essence of this horrible excuse for football. And all the players deserve credit for hanging in there, but if any other position was being played as poorly as QB, that player would be on the bench. Iowa has its destiny in its own hands, but it has to do one of three things: (1) Pray for a miracle that will turn its QB into a proficient performer or (2) Give another QB an opportunity or (3) Adjust the offense to fit the present QB — no-huddle, more roll-outs and misdirection.
There’s no good reason, other than coaching, that Iowa shouldn’t be playing Wisconsin for the Big Ten title in Indy come December. That’s what gutting this one out today means. I hope the Hawkeye coaches don’t waste this amazing effort by their players.
I disagree with the no huddle. It’s been tried and failed. It has worked in one game and tried in several since. Doesn’t fit our personnel. Especially since our qb has seemingly regressed. However I do agree that more rollouts need to occur. A lot more. We are going to see defenses over compensate for weisman. He is a proven commodity now. Need to use our te’s on boots. Very disappointed they haven’t had more targets. It would help James out. James is missing easy dump downs out of the backfield to. Tom Brady is the master at this. It’s more about stretching the lbs for future plays while moving the chains in the present.
Help me out Jack. Other than Pittsburgh last year I don’t remember Iowa making a serious effort at a no huddle. When you have receivers having trouble getting open and a QB thinking too much, it still seems like a good option. To date Vandy’s best (2) games are his 1st against Ohio State when he didn’t have time to prepare, and Pittsburgh after they went to no huddle.
Great win but lets not get carried away, this team has the ability to beat anyone remaining on their schedule or lose to anyone remaining on their schedule. However, Ferentz does seem to have the ability to make his teams improve steadily throughout the year.
What I think is exciting is the way Hitchens is flying to the ball and maybe Jordan Cotton is developing into a play maker.
They actually ran it several games after the Pitt game. Had a little success against ulm and not really any the rest of the year. Against psu they tried a few times and it did not go anywhere. They even tried yesterday and it netted a 3 and out and a 20 sec possession. I don’t understand our fan bases obsession with the no huddle I guess. It worked once against a poor Pitt defense and we should revamp and entire philosophy?
I don’t see how having receivers that can’t create consistent separation and an inaccurate qb would be a recipe for a good no huddle attack.
I asked KF last week about changing pace, increasing play count.
He said you have to be what you are. For Iowa, that’s grinder ball, which is a style of play KF, after almost 23 years of coaching and recruiting football at Iowa, believes Iowa’s recruiting base (as it’s currently configured) can sustain.
Marc agree with the recruiting thing. That’s why I thought gd was a curious hire. The lateral passing games requires shifty and quick players. The only real elusive guys I remember in Iowa’s past were Ronnie Harmon, tavian banks, and Freddie Russell. These guys don’t grow on trees.
Couple of things. # 1 mike Meyer deserves all the credit in the world. Guy is MVP of the season along with Weismann IMO. #2 there may have been 70k in ticket sales but there were pry only 50k at most there. In that sense, the weather ended up being a huge Hawkeye advantage. Makes me proud to be a hawk because a cant remember the last time kinnick was 2/3 full especially in a conference game. Bad weather or not.
Dantonio came down on the fans for not showing. I thought it was odd. The pathway out of the stadium was stacked with people at the beginning of the fourth.
Not only did a lot of them not show, a lot of them left before the final result was in.
The weather was awful, but you’re already wet. Sit down and watch.
1st off congrats Hawks on a hard fought victory. Now I hope I don’t make anybody angry, I’m a die hard Hawkeye, but JVB is playing like a true Freshman. Take a good look at the B1G TEN. Overall not any great teams this year, which tells me the Hawks should be in contention for the title but JVB is not getting the job done. Most of his passes were way off target. Maybe its the new system or maybe not. Something is going to have to change in order for this to be a good year for the Hawks. The lines (O and D) both seem to be improving and the running back, wow can’t say enough good things about Weisman other than I’m sure glad he came to Iowa City. Like everyone else that comments here I’m pulling for KF to lead the Hawks to victory in every game but with the QB ratings at the bottom of the B1G TEN its going to be real hard to win.
Some of you guys probably don’t want to hear this, but Vandenberg actually deserves some credit for some of the success of our running game. Several of the big runs that Iowa has had have resulted from Vandenberg having the option to choose a different play, but opting for the run based on what he sees from the defense.
Also, Vandenberg deserves some credit for not getting sacked too. He’s doing a much better job of noticing his protection issues (like whether or not there are rushers who are uncovered) and also getting the ball out quickly to avoid the sack.
Obviously Vandenberg is still throwing too many balls that are off-target – however, he has been throwing plenty of good balls too.
Absolutely agree. He puts Iowa in the right running play a lot.
David, throwing some good balls and some bad balls is not enough at this level. Poor throws should be an anomaly, not a constant occurrence, and we would be 6-0 right now if the JVB from last year were playing this year. ISU and Central Michigan would never have gotten close. I called my family in Iowa after the game, and after we had rejoiced over the victory, I asked where Vandenberg was and who that guy was wearing his uniform. I haven’t seen this JVB since the uncertain youngster who came in in 2009 before the half against Northwestern. If Weisman is out for any significant period with the ankle injury, JVB’s safety net is gone. And the shedule gets no easier from here. He better get it figured out, or the Jake Rudock era could start early.
Sanji I’m just starting to wonder if you are a hawkeye fan or just very bitter towards the coaching staff?? Coaches did a great job yesterday! And I agree that JVB is off his game but I think we wouldn’t be where we are without him. He does seem a bit different than he was last year but I have faith in him! I hope he can get out of this funk and prove us wrong. It’s going to remain a tough rode for us but I truly believe we can do it!! Go Hawks!!!
Ben:
Disagreement over the quality of recruiting coaching and performance of the program doesn’t end anyone’s loyalty to Hawkeye fandom. Looking for higher-level stability of the program (as shown to be possible in the past = a long time ago anyway) doesn’t make someone a “non-fan”. Refusing to accept the “aw-shucks, we’re just poor ‘ol Iowa” mantra that KF has repeated during the good (02-04) and lean times (much of the last 8 years) gets old when you start seeing the same lack of “execution” that KF raves about – and others online here dismiss as just “one guy/assignment” away from performing properly. Finally, refusing to accept the “developmental program” status – where many of our guys end up in NFL camps despite mediocre 6-8 win season – doesn’t make someone a “bad” fan; in fact, it makes them a better one.
Now, yesterday was a good victory and we are all glad to have gotten it. But it’s quite clear our offense hasn’t been the least bit dependable since 2004 – or even 2002. I will continually hope that it magically raises its level above awful (starting at QB), but know that it’s unlikely to happen. But hey, Saturday was a WIN despite everything we did to ourselves, so let’s enjoy it and hope/wish for the best next week!
Mike -
If you closely track recruiting, you’ll notice that Iowa doesn’t try to sell itself as an “aw shucks” program. If you were to track Iowa recruiting closely, you’d notice that Iowa has landed quite a bit of high level talent since 2010. The bigger problem that Iowa has had, at least a few years back, has been player attrition.
How does Iowa advertise itself? Here is the gist of what many recruits have said in prior years …
- Iowa advertises how it regularly fields a rather elite defense.
- Iowa advertises with hard facts and numbers the success of Iowa’s strength and conditioning program (Doyle is still considered one of the best in the biz)
- Iowa advertises a family environment
- Iowa NOW advertises the Coach Davis’s strong resume on O
- Iowa advertises how they field a pro-friendly O
- Iowa advertises how they encourage academic excellence among their football players (they advertise a nice graduation rate too)
- Iowa definitely strongly leans on its NFL connections AND its success developing NFL-ready players.
- Iowa obviously leans heavily Ferentz’s “OL guru” reputation and his reputation in the business as being one of the best coaches out there
I don’t see any “aw-shucks” in the above. Heck, while many fans and media knock Ferentz and the Hawks for seeingly not following the latest fads in offensive and defensive strategies – why don’t those same fans/media-types also recognize that teams like Wisconsin, Michigan State, Alabama, Stanford, and USC all share a very similar core football philosophy.
One key observation that I will make that Ferentz doesn’t make (or doesn’t make that overtly), is that Iowa is considered “fly over” territory to just about everybody who doesn’t live in Iowa. Many Iowa fans simply refuse to recognize this natural constraint that Iowa faces in recruiting. This is also a big reason why Iowa focusses its recruiting attention so much within the Big 10 footprint – we at least are pretty well recognized within Big 10 country.
While I’d contend that Iowa already has been recruiting pretty well in recent years (go check the rivals and scout sites to verify), it’s a self-evident fact that Iowa has the best luck recruiting when the team is winning. Obviously it’s a lot harder to sell the program when we’re not winning.
It seems to me that many Iowa fans think that in order for Iowa to achieve the “next level” Iowa must bring in a coach who is some sort of big-name innovator. Fans and/or media types seem to be screaming for the spread … screaming for “more aggressive” schemes on D. Good lord … what in the world is wrong with the D we have? It’s true that if Iowa’s coaching staff were more “schemers,” we might be able to sell a sexier image to recruits. The allure of our schemes might even allow us to attract in a 5-star recruit or more 4-star recruits. However, by any objective measure, can anybody really differentiate what it means for a guy to be a 3-star recruit versus being a 4-star recruit? If you do your homework and if you know anything about statistics, then it’s pretty self-evident that there doesn’t exist any legitimate classifier that distinguishes between 3 and 4 star guys.
Thus, just as long as Iowa can still have success using our current schemes with the 3- and 4-star guys who fit those schemes … what benefit does the alternative truly offer? The risk/reward here seems to be too great. Does any Iowa fan want Iowa to be like Auburn? Sure, they win the national championship one year … but a few years later the program is perceived to be in upheaval. Do people really want that?
David:
It comes down to wins and losses – and there’s been far too many “bad” losses (losses as double-digit favorites, losses in the 4th quarter in everyone’s favorite “always-competitive” mode, etc.) and just losses overall. Whether’s it’s poor/questionable recruiting (and I’ve NEVER said we need 4-5*’s to be successful), attrition, lack of execution or something else, there’s just not been enough wins to show for the NFL-development program that Iowa likes to pitch. KF DOES come across as “aw-shucks” to many folks, and that is a reason that so many recruits choose to “fly over” IC during the process.
Call it a weird feeling, but I don’t see GD sticking around more than a year or two. I’m just not sure that he’s a good fit around here – last spring, we heard about all the possibilities of up-tempo (NOT necessarily no-huddle), different passing concepts, and other things. We heard more from Greg Davis in 2 months last spring that we did from KOK in 13 years. On the field we see many similar offensive trends and not much difference from the past. I don’t know, I may be wrong here (wouldn’t be the first time), I just don’t get a feeling of cohesion among the staff. Maybe it will take a few seasons – but I don’t know. GD is the first “outsider” besides Kaczenski that KF has hired – and we know how that worked out.