Marc Morehouse

Hi, I'm Marc Morehouse. I've covered sports for more than 15 years, mostly in Eastern Iowa. I've had Hayden Fry [...]
Updated: 20 September 2012 | 6:08 pm in Hawkeye Football, On Iowa by Marc Morehouse

2-Minute Drill — The Central Michigan Chippewas


thegazette.com Copyright 2011 SourceMedia Group. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

2-Minute Drill

CENTRAL MICHIGAN (1-1) at IOWA (2-1)

IOWA RUSH OFFENSE VS. CMU RUSH DEFENSE

Another week, another new story at running back for the Hawkeyes. Against Northern Iowa, fullback Mark Weisman splashed for 113 yards and three TDs, after, of course, running backs Damon Bullock (concussion) and Greg Garmon (elbow) left the game. This week, true freshman Michael Malloy and sophomore Jordan Canzeri will enter the mix. Malloy has been in the plans all along and might’ve seen the field last week, but turned up with the flu. Canzeri tore his ACL in late March and has rehabbed to the point of return, which is likely to happen today. Whoever happens at running back — Weisman is the No. 1 today — they will benefit from an O-line that took a step forward last week. For CMU, noseguard Matt Losiniecki (6-3, 280) and end Joe Kinville (6-4, 263) lead up front. Watch for strong safety Jahleel Addae in run support. He’s CMU’s best defender. He’s active and plays with abandon. Advantage: Iowa

IOWA PASS OFFENSE VS. CMU PASS DEFENSE

It’s a nagging question/stat, but, yes, quarterback James Vandenberg doesn’t have a TD pass this season. He knows it. You know it. It’s a head-scratcher that going into week four a QB who had 25 TD passes a year ago is waiting to pop the cork in 2012. But what does it mean? There’s no Marvin McNutt, who last season set nearly every Iowa receiving record last season. Also, there’s a new offensive coordinator. It’s not an excuse, but it’s all new and it’s going to take time. CMU coach Dan Enos played at Michigan State and coached at Cincinnati and MSU under Spartans head coach Mark Dantonio. They have similar defensive philosophies, pressuring with the front four and “bending and not breaking.” This doesn’t mean the Chippewas won’t blitz. CMU starts three sophomores in the secondary, including both corners, Jason Wilson (6-0, 174) and Dennis Nalor (6-0, 178). Advantage: Even

CMU RUSH OFFENSE VS. IOWA RUSH DEFENSE

 Zurlon Tipton, a burly 6-1, 219-pound junior, leads the Chippewas’ ground game with an impressive 8.6 yards on 28 carries. He also has three TDs. Anthony Garland is the No. 2. Also a big back at 6-1, 218, Garland averages 5.7 yards on 20 carries. Keep in mind, the CMU O-line, which features three seniors, faced off with Michigan State two weeks ago. The Chippewas rushed for just 72 yards on 22 carries. CMU did a lot of damage against Southeast Missouri State in week 1, but SEMO is an FCS school that won three games last season. Again, with Enos, expect a Michigan State-like philosophy. You will see two-tight end sets and a fullback, but you’ll also see four wide. CMU has a pair of all-MAC tackles in Eric Fisher and Jake Olson, but Olson, an draft-pick caliber OT, is out for this game after leg injury against MSU. Advantage: Iowa

CMU PASS OFFENSE VS. IOWA PASS DEFENSE

QB Ryan Radcliff can bomb it. He was 19th in the nation last season with 273.8 passing yards a game. He was CMU’s MVP last season, is a team captain and is in his third year as starter. He’s approaching CMU records, but lacks a “resume” victory. Sophomore wide receiver Titus Davis (6-2, 190) earned freshman all-American last season with 40 catches for 751 yards and eight TDs. He is one of the MAC’s more explosive players, with great size and speed. Flanker Cody Wilson (5-10, 195) is third in the nation with a reception in 31 consecutive games. With the other receivers stretching the secondary, Wilson works the underneath of a defense. Jerry Harris (6-1, 187) and Courtney Williams (6-1, 212) have good size and could pose problems. Iowa’s secondary matched in zone much better last week after a few busts against Iowa State. The Hawkeyes’ pass rush is still a work in progress. Advantage: Iowa

SPECIAL TEAMS

Senior kicker David Harman is trusty, with a career percentage of 78.6 (22 of 28). He’s made just three from 40-plus in his career and has just one attempt this season. Punter Richie Hogan averages just 33.83 yards a punt and CMU’s net punting is No. 117, allowing 31 yards on two returns. Jerry Harris is one of many kick returners, and Cody Wilson does punts. The Chippewas are 62nd and 89th in the nation in those categories. True freshman punter Connor Kornbrath had his first adversity of the season last week, when he downed his own 11-yard punt. “It looked like he was going to cry after the bad one.  I was thinking about crying myself,” Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz joked. Garmon showed some juice in kick returns, taking one 39 yards last week, but he’s iffy with the elbow injury. Advantage: Iowa

INTANGIBLES

1) Iowa might be playing with fire in what could be a “malaise” game. With just three wins last season, CMU is, on paper, Iowa’s weakest opponent this season. Iowa begins Big Ten play next week with a trophy game at Kinnick against Minnesota. This is sort of along the lines of the Arkansas State game in 2009, when the Hawkeyes couldn’t get it in gear and eeked out a 24-21 victory. This team is in a different place and has to be smart enough to know it can’t afford malaise. 2) The Chippewas’ season has had a weird rhythm to it. It started with SEMO, a non-descript, and then ramped up to a rare — and probably never again — home matchup with Michigan State, a 41-7 loss. Last week, the Chips were off and now it’s Kinnick. It’s hurry-up-and-wait. That could play in their favor or not. 3) With his bullish style and genuine smile, Weisman seemed to give the Iowa huddle a much-needed shot of energy last week. Expect that to carry over, whether it’s Weisman or Malloy or Canzeri. Each has a different story and will bring new energy to the field. Advantage: Iowa

IOWA WILL WIN IF . . .

It carries the energy and vibe over from the Northern Iowa game a week ago. Iowa has the brute force to run over CMU, but it has to conjure that. Here’s where the usual pep talk about the passing game goes. It’s a work in progress, yes, but at some point it will cost Iowa a game if it can’t get into gear. You might argue it already has. This will be a good test for a defense that might be finding out how good it can be.

CMU WILL WIN IF . . .

It just plays all out with nothing to lose and it gets the running game rolling. CMU has a pair of Big Ten-sized backs. If they can get Iowa’s safeties peeking into the backfield, Radcliff is a good enough QB with terrific weapons to make the Hawkeyes pay. The Chippewas will have to withstand Iowa’s physical punch, specifically on defense. This is where a week 2 game against Michigan State, even though it was a 41-7 loss, comes in handy.

PREDICTION: Iowa 41, CMU 17

Rules of Engagement
  • Be truthful. more
  • Be civil. more
  • Be responsible. more
  • Own your words. more
  • Leave the trolls alone. more
  • Take commercial ads elsewhere. more
  • Know that comments will be moderated. more
  • Or what? more
2-Minute Drill — The Central Michigan Chippewas
  1. Some of the match-ups look a little bit different to me.

    - MSU’s passing game clearly still needs plenty of work. Maxwell looked borderline terrible against Boise State and wasn’t terribly impressive against a decent Notre Dame defense. I bring this up because the same mediocre MSU QB totally tore Central Michigan “a new one” two weeks ago.

    - Linked to the above point, Iowa is most likely going to pound the running game so that Central Michigan’s young secondary will be reading run a lot. From there, Vandenberg and Co will likely severely gash the Chippewa’s for good chunks of yardage using the play-action pass. A simple, yet effective strategy.

    The net effect: Iowa’s passing game will own a marked advantage against the Chippewas

    Another match-up that I see differently is the one between Iowa’s run D versus the Chippewa rushing O.

    - Iowa has yet to face a “bruising” set of RBs running behind a fairly experienced OL. I think that Iowa’s run D is still rather susceptible and has yet to truly be tested. Thus, at least for now, I’d give that advantage to the Chippewa O. Furthermore, you have to figure that the experienced Chippewa QB will be able to keep Iowa’s secondary rather honest.

  2. I agree with your analysis, David and I might predict a closer score. I am going with Iowa 31 C. Mich 17. Iowa getting the ground game going will be the key to this. If we can get the ground game going with more mix than Weisman off tackle, then we can set up the passing game with the thinking that our receivers can get open.

  3. I am leery of allowing a kid with a week-old elbow dislocation or a kid with a five-month-old ripped knee ligament back on the field so soon. At least they have ruled out the possibility of putting the concussed kid back on the field so soon, a lesson that perhaps they learned with Adam Robinson. This game (really, no game) is that important. If Weisman, Rogers and Malloy can’t do the job, then stick Nate Meier in there or anyone else who is HEALTHY, including some of the guys who played RB as well as DB or LB in high school. The offense is not that complex. The bottom line for me is that the potential for permanent, perhaps crippling, damage to these kids is simply not worth it.

    • Paul,

      Iowa has a pretty darn fine medical staff. If a guy doesn’t get cleared, then it’s unsafe for him to play. If a guy gets cleared to play, then it’s still NOT automatic that a kid would play. For instanace, if the injury still makes the guy play tentatively, then that actually can set the individual up for injury even more than if he’s playing in a less hesitant fashion. Anyhow, if you look at how the coaches held McCall back last year, even after he was cleared by the medical staff, they clearly care about making sure that a guy will be physically and mentally ready to take the field. Thus, I’m not at all worried that any Hawk player will get “sacrificed” simply so that we can field a player at a particular position.




Featured Jobs from corridorcareers.com