
Iowa running back Jordan Canzeri gets a ride off the field following the team's open practice Saturday, April 14, 2012 at Kinnick Stadium in Iowa City. Canzeri tore his ACL in an earlier practice this spring and will likely be out for the season. (Brian Ray/The Gazette-KCRG)
IOWA CITY — The roll call for running back on Saturday isn’t what you’d have expected back in August. Then again, it’s Iowa running back.
Up is down. Black is gold. It’s the running back apocalypse every other game. They change ACLs more than some of us change T-shirts.
Sophomore fullback Mark Weisman again will be the man when the Hawkeyes (2-1) play host to Central Michigan (1-1) this weekend. Weisman (6-0, 235) didn’t start out as the man last week, but ended up being the last man (running back) standing in Iowa’s victory over Northern Iowa.
“I went to dinner with my family and just hung out with friends,” said Weisman, who worked harder against UNI (113 yards, three TDs) last Saturday than he played Saturday night. “We watched some football. They’re my friends, they gave me a little crap, but it was all good and fun.”
Of course, Weisman was slotted into running back after sophomore Damon Bullock (concussion) and true freshman Greg Garmon (elbow) were injured in the first half. Coach Kirk Ferentz said Tuesday that Bullock is doubtful for this week; Garmon has a chance if he practices well. (If you do a quick historical look at Iowa running backs and concussions, Adam Robinson missed two weeks in 2010.)
With really nowhere else to turn, Iowa running back has a shot to grow from this. When the other backs return and Weisman slides home to fullback, there will be video that shows him as a bruising runner with decent hands and excellent blocking skills. Opposing defenses will need to note that Iowa fullback isn’t just guard No. 3.
“That’s the only good thing that comes out of this. Someone has to go in and play. It forces our hand,” Ferentz said. “We learned a lot more about Mark. We learned a lot more than we knew going into the game, so that’s a good thing.”
After the walk-on fullback who transferred to Iowa before last season from the Air Force Academy, who totaled 146 yards offense in his first extended action, who left the Academy because the life, including making his bed, was too rigid for his taste, it really gets interesting for Iowa running back this week.
Michael Malloy, also a walk-on, is No. 2. He’s a 6-0, 180-pound true freshman who’s never stepped on the field in a game. He might’ve played last week, but he sat out with flu symptoms.
No. 3 this week would be junior fullback Brad Rogers. Hey, why not? The fullback worked out pretty well last week.
No. 4 is where it gets even more interesting. Junior Andre Dawson isn’t eligible, Ferentz said, because he has a non-athletic scholarship that would be forfeited if he played.
“It’s a complicated deal, so we are limited on that one,” Ferentz said. “It’s a rule, NCAA rule.”
That brings us to Jordan Canzeri.
Canzeri suffered a torn ACL at the beginning of spring practice in March. Ferentz has maintained all along that his surgery and rehab have gone exceedingly well. Canzeri, a 5-9, 188-pound sophomore, returned to practice prior to Iowa State. He was in uniform and on the sidelines last week.
“He was cleared to play last week,” Ferentz said. “He looked OK [in practice]. To the casual observer, you wouldn’t know he was injured, but he hasn’t done a great volume of work, either.”
For the ACL math you have in your head, yes, roughly six months for Canzeri does sound extremely fast. Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson suffered a torn ACL and MCL last December and played on opening day this year for the Vikings. That’s a nine-month span, which is considered industry standard.
For an outlier example, take a look at former Hawkeye Jermelle Lewis. He suffered a torn ACL in March 2003 and returned to the field Oct. 18, which was around seven months. It was unrelated and nearly a full calendar year later, but Lewis did suffer a torn ACL in his other knee in October 2004 that essentially ended his football career.
Ferentz emphasized Tuesday that this decision doesn’t lie with the coaches. He added that there’s “medical clearance” and actually being able to play the game.
“The medical people tell us when it’s safe for a player to return. They’re the experts, not us,” Ferentz said. “Then, our job is to look at the player practice and perform. It’s conceivable that a guy could be cleared medically and then not by us. It depends on the position, the injury, that type of thing. It’s just a day at a time. . . . Part of it is player’s level of confidence, too.”
In a perfect world, Ferentz would love to redshirt Canzeri, allow him more than a year to recover and continue to build his body (he is a true sophomore). Iowa running back isn’t a perfect world. You saw Saturday. It’s more like the zombie apocalypse.
It’s all limbs on deck.
“I don’t think we are going to have that luxury this year based on [last] Saturday,” Ferentz said of Canzeri. “I think whoever can help this team win is going to help, and I just didn’t even allow myself to think about it during the course of the summer just because I didn’t think it was realistic [Canzeri's return], but he’s been cleared now, so it’s a matter of when he’s ready to play.”
I’m not worried about the running back position, Weisman looks like the man. I’m worried about the QB. Not one passing TD after 3 games! And now we play a team that we should beat by double digits. I know Capt Kirk is going to keep JV in there but it looks to me that if JV is the best QB we have then after Central Mich we are in deep trouble. Kirk if your team is going to struggle all year then let the youngsters (QB) learn on the field. JV has not played like a 5th year senior.
JVB is our bes chance to win and after Saturday Iowa will be 3-1…not the end of the world especially considering how terrible the big 10 is
Can’t argue with Bus.
It’s an oddity that Vandenberg doesn’t have a TD pass. It’s also a red flag for how the passing game has coughed along these first three weeks. It’s not a well-oiled machine in any regard.
The Big Ten is up for grabs. If Iowa wants a piece, the passing game has to be a weapon. I know, Captain Obvious on my part.
I’m really curious to see how Enos gameplans the CMU D.
By the numbers you take away Weisman first and force JVB to beat you, since he’s in the bottom decile nationally. That would be an odd thing to do, though, worrying first about the walk-on and the run game; I think if they try to stop the run first JVB is ready to light them up. We are top decile nationally in TOP, which says a lot more about the new offense than JVB’s individual stats. Rolling a safety up in run support, at some point, has to be extremely painful for an opponent unless we abandon this wide game.
Against SEMO, CMU had trouble stopping the option and had one blow up in the secondary that cost them a TD. The Chips allowed 87 yards in the second half, but SEMO is an FCS program that won three games a year ago and lost 59-0 to Purdue.
Frankly, I’m tempted to throw out CMU’s first two games.
Ferentz mentioned safeties, very active duo. MSU’s Maxwell had his best game against CMU. He’s not been impressive so far, but I’m not sure how far that goes this week.
In last week’s 51-yarder, UNI’s free safety was just behind the linebackers, only about 5 yards off the LOS. If I were scheming for Iowa, I would load up on the run and stem the safeties as much as possible. I would be especially careful when Iowa is in 2 TE, 2 FB. I would do everything in my power to get Weisman going east-west.
I hope CMU rolls their safety up like that. JVB needs a big game and he’s big enough to carry the team if we’re looking at 8 in the box and CMU bets the game on stopping our walk-on running game. I guess the first series will tell us a lot — it will be scripted and we’ll see how committed Iowa is to a blended offense.
One thing I noticed on Saturday, watching the game with Pete Gales, was that I couldn’t really discern a physical difference (stature, speed) between Iowa and UNI. That should be true as well this weekend. It’s a useful reminder to me that the days of simply outclassing a lot of nonconference teams physically are over. We have to outplay them. Which leads me back to our QB, who is due.
I thought Iowa’s OL had a size advantage.
One Scherff equaled two UNI defenders, almost literally.
But flip it to UNI’s OL, it had Big Ten size and skill. Kept a clean pocket all day for the kid from Jenks, who I expect will break some records (which might already be unbreakable) in Cedar Falls.
James looked good last game and if we weren’t running the ball so effectively I believe he could have thrown for much more. Running the ball was the game plan, if we can’t run the ball any QB will look suspect. I certainly hope James lights up the scoreboard and we actually get to see the back up QB this week so we can make some comparisons.
Made the point on radio this morning, if you objectively look at Iowa, when it comes out on the other side of this experience gap, the QB position will be central.
Next season will have experience on both lines of scrimmage. There should (SHOULD) be plenty of running backs. WR needs tightening. Lomax takes over for Hyde at corner. Kicker, punter will be the same.
QB will be brand new.