Scott Dochterman

I'm originally from Burlington, and I'm a 1997 Western Illinois University graduate. I've worked in Burlington, Muscatine, Fort Dodge and [...]
Updated: 30 August 2012 | 7:49 pm in Doc's Office by Scott Dochterman, Iowa Hawkeyes, Sports, Sports Cover Story

Iowa athletics budget grows past $80 million

Barta confirms increase for 2013 fiscal year


thegazette.com Copyright 2011 SourceMedia Group. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Iowa Athletic Director Gary Barta (left) speaks at a press conference with head football coach Kirk Ferentz at the Hayden Fry Football Complex in Iowa City on Tuesday, December 14, 2010. (Cliff Jette/Sourcemedia Group News)

IOWA CITY — Iowa’s athletics department budget will grow to more than $80.6 million for the 2013 fiscal year, Iowa Athletics Director Gary Barta confirmed Thursday.

The department’s budget size increased by more than $5.3 million from fiscal year 2012, which ended June 30. The athletics department — which receives no state funding — generated a surplus for 2012, and the money was used to pay down the department’s debt service, Barta said. Final numbers will be disclosed next month after 2013 budgets officially are approved by the state Board of Regents.

“Obviously one of the things I’m evaluated on as athletic director is making sure the finances work,” Barta said. “Fortunately again this coming year, we’ll present a budget to the Board of Regents in September that balanced last year.”

Iowa has budgeted nearly $14.6 million in debt service for projects like the Kinnick Stadium and Carver-Hawkeye Arena renovations and the newly constructed football training complex. Outside of football ($18.1 million budgeted), debt service is Iowa’s largest expense.

Barta said 10 years ago, Iowa’s capital investments constituted 5 percent of the budget. Now, facilities snag 18 percent.

Despite the increase, Barta said Iowa’s budget ranks seventh among Big Ten institutions. In fiscal year 2011, Iowa’s athletics revenue ranked fifth according to NCAA documents disclosed by 11 Big Ten schools to The Gazette via state open-records laws.

Athletics officials have budgeted to receive more than $25.1 million from the Big Ten/NCAA and $22.86 million from football this year.

Iowa has two more facility projects under way. Barta said he plans to bid the second phase of the $53 million football facility project this winter with construction beginning within the school year. He said the project should be completed by the 2014 football season.

“Ultimately it’s designing it and making sure we can pay for it before we move forward,” he said.

A $1.8 million indoor practice facility at Finkbine Golf Course should be completed in February.

Barta also is looking beyond those projects. He said it’s “still a possibility” the women’s and men’s gymnastics teams could re-purpose the current football facility as a training area. Barta also said the department will conduct a future study to determine if the baseball, softball and track facilities should remain at their current location or migrate to Hawkeye Campus in west Iowa City.

Rules of Engagement
  • Be truthful. more
  • Be civil. more
  • Be responsible. more
  • Own your words. more
  • Leave the trolls alone. more
  • Take commercial ads elsewhere. more
  • Know that comments will be moderated. more
  • Or what? more
Iowa athletics budget grows past $80 million
  1. $80 million for the worst performing, on the “field”, department in the B1G.

    Must be very well managed then.

  2. I’m also curious Jay, what are you complaining about? The money? The performance? Are you basing the performance off of the director’s cup standings…where football and women’s crew are given the same weight? If so, kudos to you.

  3. No complaint’s, just observations.

    Does any one have a better method of measuring “success”? If so, than lay it out.

    Least bang for the buck in D-1athletics? In the argument for sure, yet, nobody wants to hear it, see it or say it.

    I just happen to say it.

    • Okay, I’ll ask, where are you getting the “least bang for the buck”? From the article.

      “Barta said Iowa’s budget ranks seventh among Big Ten institutions.”

      So, we’re not the top budget out of all the teams, so how/what are you “measuring”?

  4. @Jay So you do believe that crew, field hockey, hockey, water polo, swimming, fencing, bowling, gymnastics, tennis, and skiing should carry the same weight as football and basketball or even baseball and track. Interesting. I, therefore, lend no credibility to your statement of “worst performing.”

    So Bowlsby is the greatest athletic director in NCAA history?

    • He said that based on “on field” results, Iowa is the worst performing athletic dept in the conference. That’s a fact, if you are using the Director’s Cup as a measurement. It’s not really disputable. That competition measures how well your athletic department performs nationally. Since this article is about the budget for the whole department, not just “football and basketball or even baseball and track,” it’s appropriate to look at how well the whole department does. (On a side note: including baseball as one of the major sports gives the impression that you don’t follow the non-revenue sports much in the Big Ten)

      You can make an argument that the Director’s Cup isn’t the best indicator of an athletic department’s standing, but you haven’t done that.

      Iowa’s Olympic sports have been largely inconsistent or just plain poor, with the exception of wrestling and field hockey. It’s frustrating, but hopefully things will get better as Iowa is making commitments to new coaches and upgrading facilities.




Featured Jobs from corridorcareers.com