The Big Ten made a Big Deal about releasing its 2015 and 2016 conference football schedules Monday. Well, maybe not a big deal, but it was a press release.
I took little interest in it since a) There’s no guarantee I or the world will be here in 2015 and b) who’s to say the Big Ten won’t have 32 members by then?
But then Iowa sent its version of the release with the 2013-through-2016 Hawkeye football skeds, and I took a look for some reason. Hey, I’m a curious cat.
Something struck me. Namely, this section from 2014:
Sept. 27 Open
Oct. 4 at Wisconsin
Oct. 11 Open
Oct. 18 Ohio State
After playing its four nonconference games, Iowa has an open date. Then it plays at Wisconsin. Then it has another open date.
That’s one football game in three weeks, in the heart of the season. And the Hawkeyes’ Big Ten home-opener isn’t until Oct. 18. I don’t think that will go over real well in Hawkdom.
If Iowa wants to find an upside, it’s that it will have two weeks to prepare for both Wisconsin and Ohio State and should be in pretty good health for both. But it seems like a hard way to keep a head of steam if you’re winning or to get out of the doldrums if things aren’t going so well.
Because of the vagaries of the calendar, Iowa has two open dates in 2013 and 2014. The ones in 2013 are a month apart, so that’s a little more palatable. Here are the 2013 through 2016 schedules:
2013
Aug. 31 Northern Illinois
Sept. 7 Missouri State
Sept. 14 at Iowa State
Sept. 21 Western Michigan
Sept. 28 at Minnesota
Oct. 5 Michigan State (HC)
Oct. 12 Open
Oct. 19 at Ohio State
Oct. 26 Northwestern
Nov. 2 Wisconsin
Nov. 9 at Purdue
Nov. 16 Open
Nov. 23 Michigan
Nov. 30 at Nebraska
2014
Aug. 30 Northern Iowa
Sept. 6 Ball State
Sept. 13 Iowa State
Sept. 20 at Pittsburgh
Sept. 27 Open
Oct. 4 at Wisconsin
Oct. 11 Open
Oct. 18 Ohio State
Oct. 25 Purdue
Nov. 1 at Michigan
Nov. 8 at Northwestern
Nov. 15 Minnesota
Nov. 22 at Michigan State
Nov. 29 Nebraska
2015
Sept. 5 Illinois State
Sept. 12 at Iowa State
Sept. 19 Pittsburgh
Sept. 26 North Texas
Oct. 3 Northwestern
Oct. 10 Michigan State
Oct. 17 at Purdue
Oct. 24 at Minnesota
Oct. 31 Illinois
Nov. 7 at Penn State
Nov. 14 Open
Nov. 21 Michigan
Nov. 28 at Nebraska
2016
Sept. 3 North Dakota State
Sept. 10 Iowa State
Sept. 17 Central Michigan
Sept. 24 TBA
Oct. 1 Minnesota
Oct. 8 at Michigan State
Oct. 15 Purdue
Oct. 22 at Northwestern
Oct. 29 at Illinois
Nov. 5 Penn State
Nov. 12 Open
Nov. 19 at Michigan
Nov. 26 Nebraska
Potentially, Terry Allen & Dan McCarney (and Nick Quartaro, who works for McCarney) get to play a game at “home.” Though Terry was 2-9 in his sixth year in 2011, which probably puts a lot of pressure on his this year. (Still, can you imagine being Missouri State, playing your first four games on the road, two of which were Arkansas and Oregon?) His body-bag games this year are K-State and Louisville, but at least the next two are at home. Very unforgiving game.
This whole scheduling issue is a bunch of crap.
The Big Ten Commissioner should have shoen some leadership and authority and political backbone and NOT involved the Big Ten University Presidents and Athletic Directors in initial dedision as to how to establish the tow Big Ten Divisions and scheduling for football. This crap about protecting rivalrys makes me want to vomit every time that the subject is brought up. Every Big Ten conference team/opponent should be considered a rivalry, because it is impossible to resolve/satisfy every team and fans wishes the way the divisions and scheduling has been determined. Further, labeling the two divisions Legend and Leaders also was/is hokey. Here is the way the divisions and scheduling should have been set up: Each football teams won/loss record each year should determine the divisions (team placement for the following year/a seeding method). For example, the team with the best record plaeced in one division, team with the second best record in the other division, etc. Schedules would be based on which division and placement slot the team is in each year.
The football determined divisions may then be used for other sports such as basketball each year. Also, the issues of requiring Big Ten football teams to schedule an additional Big Ten team and one less non conference team each year and requiring seven wins to qualify for boal games can only hurt teams from qualifying like Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Northwestern, etc. Teams like Ohio State, Michigan and Penn State would not be affected either way due totheir abundance of talent. Less BIg Ten teams qualifying each year would adversely affect participating team and conference revenue. Plus, although the boals may be watered down with some relatively weak teams, playing in boals should be considered a reward for the players and not the fans, etc.
deleugene
Hey, Mike
Maybe you could look into why, with the Big Ten Conference “random” scheduling, the Hawks have not had consecutive conference openers at home since Hayden Fry was the Coach.
2011 @ Penn State
2010 vs Penn State
2009 @ Penn State
2008 vs Northwestern
2007 @ Wisconsin
2006 @ Illinois
2005 @ Ohio State
2004 @ Michigan
2003 @ Michigan State
2002 @ Penn State
2001 vs Penn State
2000 @ Indiana
1999 @ Michigan State
1998 @ Illinois
1997 vs Illinois
1996 vs Michigan State
1995 @ Michigan State
That certainly is an oddity. Iowa does open at home in the conference in 2015 and 2016.
Going from Sept. 13 to Oct. 18 without a home game in 2014 — that will be hard on Hawkeye fans.