Mike Hlas

Hi, I'm Gazette/TheGazette.com sports columnist Mike Hlas. This is the Hlog. We will meet here, discuss things, and then go [...]
Updated: 21 April 2012 | 9:34 pm in Olympic Wrestling Trials, Sports, The Hlog by Mike Hlas, Wrestling

Jordan Holm’s potentially big Olympic story finishes one chapter short

Holm one win shy of going from prisoner to U.S. Olympian


thegazette.com Copyright 2011 SourceMedia Group. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

 

IOWA CITY — He almost surely would have been the most-told story about a 2012 U.S. Olympic wrester leading up to this summer in London.

But sometimes the potentially most-interesting stories have abrupt endings. Former Northern Iowa wrestler Jordan Holm’s bid for an Olympic berth was denied in the 84 kilograms final Saturday night in Carver-Hawkeye Arena.

This quest ended in Iowa City, the city in which he was convicted of third-degree sexual abuse in 2003.

Jordan Holm after his Olympic Trials finals defeat (Brian Ray/The Gazette-KCRG)

Holm served six years and nine months in prison, getting his release from Anamosa State Penitentiary in April 2010. He could have had a significantly reduced time in prison, but adamantly refused opportunities to participate in Iowa’s Sex Offender Treatment Program.

To do so would have required Holm to admit guilt. He would not.

“The worst part of my sentence was the accusation,” Holm said recently.

“Injustice is tough to deal with,” he said after his loss Saturday.

But his best-of-three final against fellow Minnesotan Chas Betts had a result that had no gray areas in anyone’s mind. The 25-year-old Betts won two consecutive tight matches. The first was 1-0, 0-3, 2-0. The second was 2-0, 2-0. That was that for Holm, 30.

“I give credit to his coaching staff and to Betts himself,” said Holm. “He’s given a lot of time to the sport.”

A total of 10 minutes of wrestling Saturday night, and Holm’s goal – — which seemed beyond unreachable during his incarceration — was gone.

“I was not disappointed with my effort,” he said. “I know I gave everything I had on the mat. I felt comfortable.”

The difference between first and second place, between pursuing Olympic gold in London and staying home in Minneapolis, was mighty thin.

“Sitting at breakfast this morning,” Holm said, “I was thinking I know my sport and I’m used to this, but in no other sport that I can think of do you train for thousands of hours, a countless amount of time and effort in a difficult sport to train in, and it comes down to four minutes of execution on the mat, six minutes tops.

“You wish you could do a best-out-of-7, a best-out-of-21, you know, but you only get a best-out-of-3. And that’s part of the beauty of the sport as well.”

No one could question Holm’s resolve, that’s for sure.

Holm rolls Zac Nielsen in a semifinal win Saturday afternoon (Brian Ray/The Gazette-KCRG)

A year after his release from Anamosa, he won the U.S. Open. Another year later, he was within a victory of joining his nation’s Olympic team.

Holm had his share of supporters in the arena that was stuffed with a record number of fans for this event.

“I’m really grateful for the crowd’s response,” Holm said Saturday afternoon after his second match of the day, a 2-0, 2-0 win over Zac Nielsen. “I feel like they have been welcoming and encouraging. I am very grateful for that.”

After his first match, a 0-1, 1-0, 5-0 victory over Cheney Haight, Holm said “I love this community. They are very knowledgeable with wrestling. It should be fun to continue to compete here.”

The fun had turned to dejection several hours later. Holm said he thinks he’ll keep wrestling. At 30, he isn’t old by Greco-Roman standards. But another Olympic bid would seem unlikely. He will be 34 in 2016, and he also wants to resume pursuit of a college degree. That’s been on hold for nine years.

“I would like to have had the chance to compete in the last two Trials,” he said. “But I’m grateful for the opportunity to be in this one.”

Yet, “It’s painful to lose. It will probably be a few days for it to kick in all the way.”

 

 

Here’s a photo gallery, provided by The Gazette’s Brian Ray and Cliff Jette, of Saturday’s Trials action:

 

Rules of Engagement
  • Be truthful. more
  • Be civil. more
  • Be responsible. more
  • Own your words. more
  • Leave the trolls alone. more
  • Take commercial ads elsewhere. more
  • Know that comments will be moderated. more
  • Or what? more
Jordan Holm’s potentially big Olympic story finishes one chapter short
  1. I was away during this case but it does remind me of a very grim prosecution and conviction of James Hall for the death of Sarah Ann Ottens, that I witnessed and wrote about for the DI. Hall’s conviction was tossed when Woodward (the state prosecutor) was found to have withheld evidence. Even to an adolescent reporter his prosecution was appalling. So this morning I spent a few hours reading about Jordan Holm.

    Here a guy is convicted despite exculpatory physical evidence, the accuser being impeached by her boyfriend — who was present in the bed where the alleged assault supposedly occurred, the accuser having spent the entire day drinking (and being thrown from a bar for fighting). The defining moment for the judge, according to transcripts, was his stunning ratiocination that because Holm had more to lose (i.e., he was an A student, successful athlete, member of a ‘good’ family, and religious) than the accuser, he therefore should be distrusted. By this standard, of course — who has more to lose? by not successfully lying — every single person ever accused of a crime is guilty.

    Equally alarming is the manner in which UNI put their own interests ahead of Holm’s, recommended a buddy to be his (incompetent) lawyer, suppressed public commentary and defense, and then washed their hands of him.

    The the State of Iowa delivers ex post facto sentencing that extends his sentence, because he refuses to admit guilt and leave prison as a self-admitted sex offender.

    This clearly was a post-Pierre Pierce prosecution.

    And I do not think charges would ever have been brought had Holm been black. It would have created a national firestorm, when the only evidence against him was the testimony of an accuser who is impeached by her own boyfriend (who was 24 inches from the alleged crime scene), and the interior monologue of a single white judge. No way. That case doesn’t get tried in a white midwestern town. But Johnson County got their white wrestler convicted here.

    I don’t think this story is over. I hope that Holm can continue to pursue the recovery of his life. I do hope his last appeal is successful. I doubt he would have a problem submitting to a re-trial by jury, although sadly I don’t think Johnson County would dare attempt to prosecute him again.




Featured Jobs from corridorcareers.com