
Caption: Iowa offensive line coach Brian Ferentz talks to players during practice at Kinnick Stadium on Wednesday, March 28, 2012, in Iowa City, Iowa. (Jim Slosiarek/The Gazette-KCRG)
This is the time of year in college football when there are more questions than answers. This spring with the Iowa Hawkeyes, there seems to be as many questions as blades of plastic grass in the Kinnick Stadium turf.
In the four months since Iowa’s 31-14 defeat to Oklahoma in the Insight Bowl, head coach Kirk Ferentz has hired two new coordinators, two Generation Y position coaches and has moved his offensive line coach of nine years to defensive line coach.
The quarterback is veteran, but the passing game will be new under first-year offensive coordinator Greg Davis. Iowa has a new defensive line, but it will line up in the old 4-3 defense, with a few twists, under first-year defensive coordinator Phil Parker, who is the old defensive backs coach.
Everyone is on a learning curve. Don’t expect anything definitive to be unveiled Saturday.
1. Check out the coaches — Maybe the best part of the spring scrimmage is seeing the coaches coach. This is hands-on stuff that’s different from the game day environment. You might be close enough to hear what the coaches are yelling, if the Kinnick Stadium music is at a human volume.
Expect Davis to spend most of his time with quarterback James Vandenberg. Playbook is one thing for Vandenberg next season, but communication with the offensive coordinator is up there, especially with the coordinator in the press box for the first time in at least 13 seasons.
Where will Parker spend most of his time? He said he likes to roam. Will he spend a lot of time with the defensive line, Iowa’s most inexperienced position group with first-year D-line coach Reese Morgan, who moved over from O-line in February?
Kirk Ferentz knows what to expect because he hired them (maybe not technically in the case of his son), but LeVar Woods and Brian Ferentz aren’t that far removed from playing the game. They are acutely aware how chain of command works, but this will be their first public appearance in Iowa gear and it will be interesting to see them in that role.
1.1 — During his interview last week, Morgan seemed downright giddy about the challenge that Kirk Ferentz put out there for him. You know Ferentz isn’t a man who acts on hunches. It’s an unorthodox move, and Morgan is totally into it. The raw material is, well, raw, so Morgan has work to do.
1.2 — Is there a “yeller” on staff? Does there need to be one?
1.3 — One-liner contest, Greg Davis vs. Norm Parker. Who wins?
2. Passing game and pace — They’ve said the passing game will change. Davis and Vandenberg have said it. Wide receivers coach Erik Campbell said it. It’s changing, yes, but will you be able to pick those changes out of a line up?
Senior wide receiver Keenan Davis is out Saturday, but if he ran a different route on a given down and distance, would we know that it was different from last season? Probably not, but maybe. Will routes shorten? That would be noticeable.
Davis talked some about a no-huddle attack. That’s more likely an arrow in the quiver than the rule of the day, but also remember that Iowa coaches want to play to strengths. You could argue the no-huddle, shotgun is Vandenberg’s strength.
Player profiles certainly will change along with this. You’ve already heard Davis hype up tight end C.J. Fiedorowicz. He also talked about sophomore wide receiver Kevonte Martin-Manley’s role in the slot, a role he called “important.”
2.1 — The pecking order at tight end might be interesting. Senior Zach Derby will have to fight off talented underclassmen Ray Hamilton, Henry Krieger-Coble and Jake Duzey.
2.2 — Davis should return for Iowa’s final three spring practices (there’s more after Saturday’s scrimmage). After Davis and Martin-Manley, how does Iowa wide receiver go?
3. Simply put, running back — Sophomore Jordan Canzeri is out with a torn ACL, so the opportunity falls to sophomores Damon Bullock and De’Andre Johnson.
As you know, opportunity is a slippery proposition for Iowa running back. Canzeri will begin rehabilitation. Freshmen Greg Garmon and Barkley Hill remain incoming freshmen.
The immutable fact is Canzeri was ahead of both Bullock and Johnson. They all had the opportunity to start the Insight Bowl, and Canzeri ran with it. That said, players can improve. The light goes on at different times for everyone. It’s Iowa running back, opportunity is perpetual.
3.1 — Davis made it sound as though there is a plan for fullback and it might be as the lone running back in a four-WR set. Junior Brad Rogers should be a completely different player after missing all of the 2011 offseason with heart concerns. Davis also said Rogers knows fullback and running back. Hmmm.
4. Punter, let’s just get it out there — Of all things to consider, here we are at punter. It’s decidedly unsexy, that is until zero hang time, returnable punts and shanks haunt your special teams.
This spring, it looks as though senior John Wienke has held off sophomore Jonny Mullings. Wienke’s journey is somewhat circuitous. He came here to play quarterback. He kind of wedged his way into backup punter last fall. Now, he’s the No. 1. Running backs and co-special teams coach Lester Erb did remind reporters this spring that Wienke was an all-conference punter during his days at Tuscola (Ill.) High School. He punted 14 times as a senior.
Incoming freshman Connor Kornbrath will be here in August. He’s a true freshman. He’s been told he has the opportunity to win the job, but he’s going to have to do just that. Win it.
4.1 — We won’t see kickoffs Saturday. And remember there, kickoffs are from the 35 this season with touchbacks coming out to the 25. Another caveat, we all will track field goals Saturday, but we need to keep in mind that this is 1/15th of what they’ve done this spring. Don’t run too far with Saturday’s conclusions.
5. Popping the cushion — Parker said Iowa will play more press coverage (or man) this season in order to deploy more defenders in run support. He also threw about a dozen caveats in front of that statement, with third down and the opponent ultimately steering that call.
Iowa has the cornerbacks to fight this fight. Senior Micah Hyde will be a three-year starter. Junior B.J. Lowery played nickel last season and made, arguably, the stop of the year to complete a goal-line stand in the Hawkeyes’ victory over Michigan. Beyond them, senior Greg Castillo has experience and sophomore Jordan Lomax has impressed.
This might have been a better show Saturday with a healthy Keenan Davis, but it’ll put sophomore strong safety Nico Law in the spotlight. He might have some freedom to pursue and punish at the line of scrimmage.
5.1 — This will be redshirt freshman tackle Darian Cooper’s first appearance in front of a crowd since he made a splash in shorts and shoulder pads last August. He’s listed as a starter and he should hold.
5.2 — We won’t see him Saturday because he’s rehabbing a knee that was operated on in January, but sophomore defensive tackle Carl Davis‘ progress has a lot of eyes on it. If the 6-5, 310-pounder is healthy and engaged, Iowa’s D-line might be able to rumble. Does it matter how a player is coached? Pending that knee, we might find out with Davis. He was coached hard by former DL coach Rick Kaczenski. Morgan might be a gentler voice. If Davis responds with meaningful contributions, we might have an answer.
4.0: Marc, can you smell any upcoming fake punts FOR Iowa for the first time in Ferentz History, er, the last 14 years?
Random speculations from a guy with college football withdrawal:
Parker’s transcript discusses going man on the outside to run a ‘seven in the box’ scheme — but of course, if you go cover zero, you’ll be 8 or 9 in the box. So I didn’t understand his p.c. comment.
Just assimilating a few different comments, it sounds to me like they think Nico Law can be a real leverage point if he can make the transition from unguided, to guided, missile, and Tanner will be playing centerfield. It will be interesting to compare Iowa’s defense to Virginia Tech’s, if this is what we do. It sounds a lot like VT, to me, at least in the secondary.
Texas Tech/Leach managed to put the air yards on the board running smash and four verticals 60 times per game — with average footspeed on the outside. I wonder if Davis’s offense has been predicated on ‘long lateral’, yards after catch scheme. That certainly is one of the biggest beefs the Texas fans had — horizontal passing. What I liked best about O’Keefe’s scheme was the way he punished cheating safeties by going play action and then long, over the top. If we’re slow *and* we go horizontal, well, I don’t know how well that’s going to work. It sounds, though, like Davis’ virtue is his adaptability, and he’s all but predicting that we’re going to have tight ends in the seam, and bunched WR working heavy underneath. This predicts a big season for Kevonte, if indeed he is the slot (the Welker position).
I hope we don’t lose our culture of physical o-line play, in this transition to a multiple, edge-focused offense.
I can’t believe they’ll show much of the new O today, however. Why give the other teams’ coaches a study hall?
Davis sounds like a Bill Walsh disciple. He’s going to employ what Walsh introduced years ago, short, well timed, passes that put pressure on the defense to read the route and jump it. The problem with this approach is you must have an accurate, smart QB and they don’t grow on trees. You also have to have smart-ish wide receivers who can read a defense just as the QB does. There is improvisation, at some point, once trust is developed. I expect Davis has added variations, such as the deep pass when the safeties cheat up (safeties cheat not just to stop the run but the stop the running-passing game too. Sounds like he is going to target mismatches ala basketball (size and positioning over traditional notions of being open). I also think Davis is going to have an audibilized running game from the gun just as New England has occasionally run very well. If the defense swaps out linebackers for DBs, then you run, out of a no huddle without substituting and just punish the mismatch. If they stay conventional, you run their LBs ragged, as we did Pittsburgh.
The whole scheme requires smart and precise wide receivers, big strong handed TEs and running backs that can catch the ball and run it–blocking less emphasized. If Vandy is still holding the ball after 3 seconds, then he’s at fault.
I am not sure Vandy can run this offense or, rather, will run it well. He’s not particularly accurate, he’s a slow processor of info, he take fore-ever to get the ball out of his hands. He’s smart at the line of scrimmage though. We’ll see. Maybe Davis frees him up by making the passing game more of a reflex.
I’m looking forward to seeing it unfold. But I think Davis deserves a couple of years to get the culture change this will require.
In the big business world that is college football you don’t get a couple years. Especially when you have a successful program like Iowa that has gone 8-5 and 7-6 and that *sucked* per most fans…
I don’t like fake punts….they are fine when they work, but killers when they don’t……
I also hate the shotgun hand off, but it is necessary now-a-days for a change up in the gun. It isn’t however effective for a physical downhill running game…i/e: what Texas transitioned back to.
Vandy will be fine in this O…..keep in mind these “epic” accuracy numbers are as much a product of “the system” not the other way around…hence these guys go to the NFL and bomb.
AS per the “speed” stuff…..I made some comments in one of Hlas’s blogs but I have a little trouble with this thought. I have long said Iowa needs to “up” their WR portfolio (though that has been better of late) as they produce elit NFL talent everywhere but their QB’s and Rbers to a degree.
With that said….super fats Texas has 4 NFL WR’s….we have none, but tOSU has SEVEN, Michigan 4, Illinois 4, MSU 3……moral of the story being Texas aint producing “fast” WR at an epic level and really what “is” fast…
Per the combine times I’ve looked at year after year these supposedly fast southern teams are mysteriously not running faster when timed. And the NFL is full of WR’s (very, very good ones at that) who ran slower than Marvin McNutts 4.54…
So maybe what he really means is he wished we had “more” “better” WR’s…..
Just my thoughts,
Chad