I'm a columnist and member of The Gazette's editorial board. I live in Iowa City. Twitter: @jhemmingsen, or Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hemmingsenyah
Updated: 31 December 2011 | 12:00 am in You are here by Jennifer Hemmingsen

Victor’s story, part 2: No hope for family placement

5 Comment now

thegazette.com Copyright 2011 SourceMedia Group. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

When it became clear to Victor Rodgers that he wasn’t going to have custody of his daughter, Karee, he turned to his twin sister, Victoria, for help. She agreed to take the child in .

“I’ve never had to deal with DHS or anything before. This is my first experience. But I felt like when DHS came into my brother’s life, he needed the support of the family,” she told me. “Family reunification, I always thought, was first and foremost.”

Victoria has no children of her own. She has never been arrested, has a stable place to live and a good job working as a full-time cook for kids at an Illinois residential treatment facility. There was every indication she could provide a stable, loving home for Karee.

At Iowa’s request, the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services did a home study of Victoria’s home on Aug. 31, 2010. They approved her for relative foster care placement.

But when it arrived, the social worker just set it aside. Already, the court had started hearings to terminate Victor’s parental rights.

After Victor’s rights were terminated in November 2010, Victoria told social workers she wanted to adopt Karee. In April 2011, Iowa asked Illinois to do another study of Victoria’s home. Again, she was approved, but Iowa said it wasn’t sufficient – Illinois workers had conducted another relative placement study, not an adoptive home study.

“Every time I cleared one hurdle, they came with another hurdle,” Victoria told me. “It was almost like a decision had been made before they even interviewed me.”

Victoria even submitted letters from coworkers and her minister attesting to her character:

“Victoria has a fun and outgoing personality and a love for people,” wrote her bishop at the First Free Will Baptist Church, where she’s been a member for 20 years. “She often spends time with the young people and gives them words of encouragement. They love it when she volunteers to cook for them on special events.”

A social worker who had worked with Victoria for a year praised her “innate ability and desire to provide for and protect those that can not protect themselves.” She encourages the children she works with “to be the best person they can be while providing them with the support and love needed to freely be their best.”

“Victoria will be great at providing a safe and nurturing home for a child,” She wrote. “She has emotionally adopted several young people in her life time and their lives are enhanced because of it.”

Last October, Victoria was interviewed by Iowa DHS adoption specialists, who later noted they were concerned by “Ms. Rodgers’ insufficient information regarding her brother’s legal issues and the risks that he would potentially pose to the child if allowed access to the child or to care for the child.”

Oct. 14, 2011, Victoria received a letter signed by a DHS adoption specialist. It read: “Dear Ms. Rodgers: An adoption staffing was recently held to match the family who would best meet the need of Karee Robinson. While your family was given careful consideration and many strengths were noted, another family was selected.

“We want to thank you for responding and we encourage you to continue your interest in special needs adoption,” the letter read. “Your home study will continue to be available for consideration for other children.”

She had no right to appeal.

Rules of Engagement
  • Be truthful. more
  • Be civil. more
  • Be responsible. more
  • Own your words. more
  • Leave the trolls alone. more
  • Take commercial ads elsewhere. more
  • Know that comments will be moderated. more
  • Or what? more
5 Comment Now
Victor’s story, part 2: No hope for family placement
  1. If the goal was to keep the child safely away from Mr. Rodgers, giving her to his twin sister would seem to be very counter productive. Do you actually believe she would keep the child from him? The court was right this time.

    I do believe that there are times that foster care and adoption are not a good idea and that former spouses can invent false environments and accusations to take children away. But in this instance, I’m a firm believer that the right thing was done.

  2. They were not right! He wasn’t accused of a crime against the child. How is seeing him during a family get together or a holiday going to effect her negatively!

    That would be far better than being given to a family who doesn’t know you and keeps you because they get a check for doing so!

    Federal Law says that the state is required to give relatives the first option to adopt because it is better for the childs well being. Iowa does not follow the laws and makes stupid excuses for not doing so!

  3. The worry is not about family gatherings — but the possibility that the sister would give the child to him long term. It’s been done before.
    The adoptive family does not receive checks for caring for her.

  4. When you adopt you still have to follow the foster care rules. She couldn’t just give the child to him.
    The State does provide subsidies to adoptive parents. Look it up! I have friends that have adopted and I am foster care certified. It depends on how they write the terms of the adoption. If you are getting a child from the state – they pay you. If you are adopting from an agency you pay them. You can have it written in that you don’t want anything! I highly doubt that they All choose that as an option. They also get medical coverage as well. If the child has issues “special needs” of any kind they pay more. Look it up!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting




Featured Jobs from corridorcareers.com