






For a while Wednesday night, after I finished an e-mail exchange with The Atlantic about The Gazette’s Eastern Sunday front page from 1994, I thought I would end up being the last person on Earth to write about University of Iowa journalism and mass communication Professor Stephen Bloom’s Atlantic piece, “Observations on 20 Years of Iowa Life.”
I spent most of Wednesday talking with others about the piece, checking archived material and then making up to my wife for a long day at the office by taking her out for dinner. Surely the furor would simmer, I thought, but I ought to blog something. This is 2011, after all, and everyone else is blogging about the paper of which I am the editor.
The beast, it seems, is in no danger of dying off so that we can move on to more important matters — and those matters exist. I’m certain I will not be the last person to write about Bloom’s piece.
My observations are from 55 years of Iowa life. I spent three others in Minnesota, either attending school or working. I’d elaborate on living in Minnesota but Iowans make Minnesota jokes, as do Minnesotans about Iowans, and the market for picking on a state right now is not booming.
Reporters and columnists who appear in The Gazette have provided plenty of information about what the front page of the 1994 Easter Day Gazette displayed. No need to belabor that.
However, worth noting is why I wanted to pore through our archives at The Gazette. I wanted to do this because some folks who have been here a long time had memories of seeing the kind of headline Bloom described. The notion was in the back of my mind, as I’ve talked with Bloom about it personally — he brings it up a lot — and many years ago at one of his classes while speaking about journalism, in general. I agree with him that a declarative headline, “He is Risen,” plastered across the page of a newspaper would not be news and, in fact, would be inappropriate in a newspaper whose mission is reporting the news instead of making faith statements.
So I wanted to check archives thoroughly so that we could state factually what we found.
What I am confident about is:
Other points:
The article’s snarkiness gets in the way of the fact that:
Finally,
Now, I have to write a column for Sunday. It was going to be about efforts Iowa journalists are going to take next month to shed light on your rights to open government. I guess that will have to wait while this tempest continues to brew.
Some of what’s out there
“Bloom has lived in Iowa for 20 years. I’ve lived here three times that long and have never been to a tractor pull. In fact, I can’t think of any friends who have been to a tractor pull but then that’s not something my friends would mention out of fear of ridicule.
“In fact, just last Sunday, when my friends and I could theoretically been at a tractor pull, we were instead at a poetry reading in Mount Vernon (pop. 4,000) where I live…”
– From a website called SteveIowa.com.
—
“Gazette reporters have been working to debunk – or at least to respond to – professor Steve Bloom’s Atlantic article that hickified most of Iowa.
“Todd Dorman, a columnist, has been responding with opinion on where Bloom went wrong in his generalities, while reporter Patrick Hogan was early to respond with questions of accuracy…”
– From a blog by Robert (Ted) Gutsche Jr., a doctoral candidate at the UI School of Journalism and Mass Communication
Gutsche sent me this in an e-mail Thursday morning:
“You might want to check this out: The Atlantic’s description of Iowa in 1900 is quite similar to the one in 2011. Have things really not changed or is this about something else?
http://blog.robertgutschejr.com/?p=497
—
E-mail exchange from Dec. 14, 2011, with Garance Franke-Ruta, senior editor, The Atlantic
—
Articles
UI President Mason issues open letter about The Atlantic article.
Iowans outraged over article critical of rural state: Reuters report.
A journalism professor derides Iowa, questions its clout and unleashes a bipartisan fury: Washington Post.
Iowans Respond to Stephen Bloom: Blog by Garance Franke-Ruta is the senior editor at The Atlantic who edited Bloom’s piece.
Lyle, I’m kicking myself for not seeing this sooner: Bloom’s essay MUST be read as satire. Whether it’s the thresher demo derby, the small towns of meth addicts and the elderly, what people in Iowa City (IOWA CITY!?) said about his golden, or the real reason for mudrooms, Bloom’s portrayals are so broad and crudely rendered (think crayon instead of pastels), that he is really lampooning the attitides of the snobbish audience he is writing to.
That may be the ultimate insult. If his intent was serious, Bloom failed utterly, and in the process wrote a brilliant satirical piece without meaning to.
That reading works for me…
I’ve said this before, but I’ll repeat it: I got the impression that Bloom sought to interweave the misconceptions often held by those who have never been to Iowa with the realities those of us who live here know about all too well. In the process Bloom uncovered some ugly truths about Iowa, but also the beauty those who live here know exists.