
The battleship USS Iowa is pushed by tugboats stern first under the Benicia-Martinez bridge on Suisun Bay Thursday, Oct. 27, 2011, in Benicia, Calif. After resting in the Suisun Bay Reserve "mothball fleet" for a decade, the famous battleship is taking the first leg of its journey to southern California, where the Pacific Battleship Center intends to transform the vessel into an interactive museum permanently based at Berth 87 in Los Angeles. The Iowa will be towed to Richmond, Calif., on Friday for significant refurbishment until at least the end of the year and possibly through the first part of 2012 before the move south. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)

The battleship USS Iowa is pushed by tugboats past the Benicia-Martinez bridge on Suisun Bay Thursday, Oct. 27, 2011, in Benicia, Calif. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)

The battleship USS Iowa is pushed stern first by tugboats on Suisun Bay Thursday, Oct. 27, 2011, in Benicia, Calif. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)

The battleship USS Iowa is pushed by tugboats beside the Benicia-Martinez bridge on Suisun Bay Thursday, Oct. 27, 2011, in Benicia, Calif. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)
Thanks to William Halsey’s refusal to cover the San Bernardino Strait with Task Force 34 (his fast battleships which included the Iowa), we never had a chance to see the Iowa-class ships sink the Yamato…
Have to respectively disagree Jeff. Halsey’s unit (7Th. or 3Rd. fleets, I forget, was chasing the Japanese attempt (successful) to draw out the U.S. surface fleet north. Purpose was to sacrifice their naval air power. San Bernardino was left without heavy surface units due to miscommunication resultant from a less than optimal command structure. When the fact of the situation became apparent Halsey was too far north for quick response to the southern threat. Had he broke off and returned south for the decisive heavy surface engagement he might well have not gotten there in time and ended up dithering between two potential engagements, and contributing to neither. He chose to continue north; at that time still believing he could destroy the Japanese carrier fleet. It was a call and most historians tend to side with his choice.
As history buffs we’d all like to be able to ruminate over the heavy surface battle that never was, but the sailors in position to engage likely only breathed a sigh of relief. Personaly I believe the Japanese heavy units would have been torn to shreds and spit out, but not without taking our own hits. The U.S. Pacific Fleet, at this time, was extremely battle tested, proven, and, as the Navy puts it “Ready”.
Given all this the Iowa is, to this day, an impressive sight. I think it is a testament to what America can accomplish given the state of our heavy units on Dec. 8, 1941.
Halsey was Third Fleet, Kinkaid the Seventh. Third Fleet was relabelled Fifth when Spruance was in command, to confuse the Japanese. Both Halsey and Kinkaid share some responsibility for keeping the strait open: Kinkaid did not follow through aggressively enough with Halsey, and the split command (Halsey reported to Nimitz, Kinkaid to MacArthur) didn’t help. The wag in me wants to heap all the blame on MacArthur!
But Halsey could have detached his battle line and one carrier group to cover the strait, and had enough strength left to handle Ozawa’s carriers, which were almost naked of aircraft anyway. By going north, Halsey did exactly what the Japanese hoped he would do, leave the Leyte beachhead exposed to Kurita’s striking force. Halsey had a vision of bringing the Japanese carriers under the guns of his battleships.
Factor in Spruance’s failure to destroy the Japanese fleet in the Marianas in Halsey’s favor; however, also factor in naval intelligence which showed the Japanese, before the Battle of the Phillipines Sea, would use a feint attack to lure the US fleet away from the beachhead so it could sneak an attacking flotilla in to attack transport shipping. That works against Halsey.
Then there were no one, but TWO typhoons that Halsey steered Third Fleet into…
You are watching milions upon millions of US tax dollars floating away. Battleships have been out moded since before the last refit of the Iowa. All the high tech improvements still made it a floating island of steel that was slow, and out of date with modern Naval warefare, as it’s grounding in the mud during shake down attests.
The sailors killed when one of the turrets exploded was never accurately investigated and for all intent and purpose the Iowa is a floating monument to political cover-up.
It’s a shame you have only scorn for one of the last icons of the U.S. Navy’s finest hour.
Steve,
The Iowa is a floating piece of US history. She was the ONLY ship of her class to serve in the Atlantic in WWII.
It also served as the flagship for the US fleet when the Japanese surrendered at Tokyo Bay.
She deserves to be placed as a floating museum so the public can see a living piece of a history.
Ever been on the USS Missouri in Pearl? Even though the restoration had just begun in ’05, Big Mo is physically imposing, and it was cool to stand where the Japanese signed the surrender in 1945.
I know i’m a bit off topic. But can anyone tell me the truth about the USS LIberty on june 8th 1967.
The Israelis bombed the **** out of a US Navy vessel, and remained an ally of the US.