
So I spent my evening with the good Republican delegates of state Senate District 18. They conventioned last night in Marion to chose a candidate for the Nov. 8 special election to fill the vacant seat left by Swati Dandekar, D-Marion, who is off to the Iowa Utilities Board.
If Republicans win, they would knot the Senate 25-25 and erase a thin Democratic majority. High stakes.
And yet there was little in the way of high political drama. The only real debate among the delegates was over the notion of allowing them to question the candidates, and for how long. It was not part of the original agenda, which involved short speeches followed by balloting. But after some haggling, the delegates decided to question the three hopefuls – Linn County GOP co-chair Cindy Golding, former U.S. Atty. Matt Dummermuth and Marion businesswoman Mary Rathje.
I think that was an important call, in the end. I went into the convention thinking Rathje was probably the favorite, with the apparent backing of Gov. Branstad and other top Republicans.
But during questioning, it became clear that Golding was the most articulate, enthusiastic, prepared and polished candidate. Rathje seemed pretty nervous at times totally unprepared for a grilling. Dummermuth is a smart, thoughtful and accomplished guy, but, how can I put this gently, he’s got an enthusiasm/emotion deficiency. It afflicts many Midwestern males, like myself. We’re all working for a cure, I guess. Soon as the ballgame’s over. Lawn needs mowin.’
Anyway, Golding mopped up. If there hadn’t been Q&A, it might have been different, or at least a tighter vote.
I think Golding could be a fairly formidable candidate. You’d better get used to hearing the numbers 4 and 6. She and her husband have four businesses and six children. She noted that, oh, about 174 times.
She has some Statehouse lobbying experience tied to her work with the National Federation of Independent Business and the Farm Bureau. The helped her be more conversant on state issues than her rivals, like when she explained that school reform and property tax reform are linked.
And I, an independent District 18 voter, give her a few bonus points for:
Saying that the two state senators she admires are former Sen. Andy McKean, R-Anamosa, and the late Mary Lundby, who represented Marion in the Senate and House. They’d both make my list of high-quality, independent-minded lawmakers I’ve covered.
When asked whether they would represent the views of their constituents or use their own judgment, the age old question of representative democracy, Golding said a lawmakers’ biggest job is to “make sure your constituents understand the issues.” To many lawmakers forget that part.
She didn’t pander. When asked about abortion, Golding said she’s pro life and would work to limit abortions. But she also noted that the state is constricted by the framework of Roe v. Wade. Maybe that’s not what the delegates wanted to hear, but it’s true.
And why did she give $50 to Democrat Ed Fallon’s gubernatorial campaign? Golding said her family owns an organic farm, and Fallon is a big proponent of organic ag. So she tossed him a small gift for his longshot bid. Makes some sense.
So now we’ve got a race.
Golding won despite being a resident of a part of rural Cedar Rapids that will not be part of the Marion-centered Senate district created by redistricting. So if she wins this year, next year she’ll be running as an incumbent in a largely new district. And Republicans will need to find a new candidate in the Marion area. Note to the GOP, Rathje has brochures already printed up with no year on them.
We got a short glimpse of part of Golding’s strategy. She called her soon-to-be-official Democratic rival Liz Mathis “formidable.” But then she argued that Mathis has “connections to downtown Cedar Rapids.” Cue the ominous music.
“We are different,” Golding said. “We are not Cedar Rapids and we will make that distinction.”
For me, a SD 18 resident with downtown Cedar Rapids connections, a.k.a. a job, this rings odd. A businesswoman like Golding surely understands and appreciates our interconnected regional economy, with Cedar Rapids as its hub.
But maybe among others it will resonate. I guess there’s a reason that cannon in Marion is still pointed toward CR. We’ll see.
did you get to go to the Democrat nominating convention ?
The Dems meet next Wednesday (Sept 28). It, like all Linn County Democratic Central Committee meetings, is open to the public.
I’ll be in attendance for the official coronation next week, if that’s what you mean. But I’m anxious to get past the pickin’ and on to the campaignin’
I think we all are Todd.
Nice column, Todd. Now for the shocker: I liked opening the floor to questions from the delegates, so the nominees had to perform as they will in the special election.
Kudos to the GOP for a process which, according to what I’ve read here, allowed District 18 Republicans to select their best candidate. We are all better served when the electoral parties put their best candidates (as opposed to the best-connected) forward.
Let the race begin!
I was gong to congratulate the Republicans for supporting democratic principles….until I read this:
“The precinct leaders — all longer-standing members of the Linn County Republican Central Committee ***because the local party decided to not allow any newcomers who had filled vacancies to vote in the nominating convention*** — decided between three individuals who wanted to be the Republican nominee in Senate District 18.” (emphasis mine) http://iowaindependent.com/61438/golding-chosen-as-senate-district-18-gop-nominee
Seems they don’t really let their duly-elected members to vote unless the powers-that-be approve of ‘em So much for democracy.
Sad the Gazette hasn’t reported on this, yet keeps taking veiled shots at the Dems even before they’ve held their convention. OK, Lynch and Doorman, step up.
Joe, perhaps you are not aware of how the delegate system works in the linn county republican party ? two people at a caucus are elected for each precinct to lead the caucus (chair and co-chair). these 2 people get to vote for the precinct in this type of special election. people who were on the list who did not show up, did not get to vote on Thursday. so if someone is a chair and never comes back, the position can get filled by request each week. but they felt that only the people who voted during Swati’s election should be allowed to vote on her replacement.
I suppose they could have held a new election for precinct chair to fill out every precinct, but we would have been fighting until next week.
Exactly, Mr. Cobert.
The process done by the Republicans was fair, open and transparent.
The same can NOT be said for the Democrats.
Interesting, Joe. The continued Democrat-bashing by our GOP colleagues is making me regret having said anything positive about the Republican process…
“I don’t see any benefit in a contest between a number of people that might weaken a prime candidate,” said Diane Hoffmann of Mount Vernon, the Linn County Democratic Party chairwoman.”
She declined to identify the candidates the party is considering.”
http://thegazette.com/2011/09/19/parties-racing-for-dandekar%E2%80%99s-open-seat/
Mr. Stutler, true, or not?
Yes..its unfortunate for the Democrats that their District 18 delegates will NOT have the same opportunity to pick a candidate of THEIR choosing…instead, they are being force fed a pre-approved candidate by the Iowa Democratic Party and labor unions.
Really, Todd? You’re still trotting out that tired nag?
Say, curious….was Versteegh your maiden name?
Mr. Stutler..I don’t know who you are referring to.
However, I’m not surprised that you can’t defend your party’s unwillingness to allow the rank and file members who live in District 18 to pick a candidate of THEIR choosing, rather than a pre-approved candidate.
Why do the Democrats fear an open and transparent process, Mr. Stutler? People are tired of candidates who are picked behind closed doors.
Mr. Johnson née Versteegh, I’m sure you are shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! as well.
I can’t defend, or you’re too darned stupid to understand it once it’s been explained to you a half-dozen times or so.
Perhaps next Thursday you’ll be able to talk about how the Dems did things wrong. Until next Wednesday evening, you’re merely speculating.
The Repubs, on the other hand, DID NOT ALLOW all duly elected central committee members from the district to vote for the candidate of their choice. Indeed, they were not allowed to vote at all. Talk about a scam. Talk about changing the rules of the game to define the outcome. #Coproencephalic
actually joe, all members who were elected when the seat was filled were allowed to vote. members who showed up to vote and then disappear were sorely disappointed.
Versteegh is a blast from the past! Boy, Joe, can I tell stories about the U of I CRs and YAFfers from back in the Nineties!
Wasn’t former Hawkeye Trades and Labor Council official Alan Bernard on the Linn County Democrats Central Committee? If so, did he live in Swati’s District? Has he been replaced?
i thought the democrats were voting on it at their next meeting ? are they not getting the same benefits the GOP membership was given ? wow , talk about disenfranchised , not even allowing them to vote…… for shame, for shame.
I guess it depends on how you define “vote”. They can probably say “yes” or “no”, but since only one choice is allowed, it’s kind of a moot point.
I was disappointed that the three were not allowed to vote. I don’t recall any other regularly scheduled Central Committee meeting when we voted new members in but told them they would not be official until a certain date. Sure, they didn’t have a voice before they were voted in that evening but after the vote not being allowed to participate, in my opinion was wrong. When we held the special election over on the west side the Committee drug a homeless man in to vote. But, then again, that was just “the westside”. Any Republican that tries to say that everything done by the GOP leadership is open and transparent is not being open and transparent.
Excellent article Todd!
Kathy, you missed the point of openness . only the people that were present to vote for Swati were allowed to vote for her replacement. if we had allowed Terry Branstad’s crew to stack the deck, then Rathje would have easily won. instead we get the people who originally voted for the seat to elect the replacement for the seat. after the “westside debacle” the last LCRCC leadership team had , it was refreshing to see an open and honest election . hopefully this is a sign of good things to come.