
The list of potential candidates for the open Senate District 18 seat vacated by Swati Dandekar is taking shape.
We have at least two Republicans, both businesswomen, Mary Rathje and Cindy Golding. It’s possible other Republicans will emerge before (Wednesday) THURSDAY night district nominating convention.
Democrats are trying to stay mum, although it appears that former KCRG and KWWL anchor Liz Mathis will be their candidate. No announcement has been made, (SEE ANNOUNCEMENT BELOW) and the formal nominating convention is Saturday Sept. 28.
But one group, Faith in Iowa, seemed to spill the beans last night in a press release urging members to get involved in Mathis’ campaign. An excerpt:
…But today is a new day and the Democrats can hold on to that Senate seat.
Why?
Because Liz Mathis the Democratic candidate for Iowa Senate District 18!
As the former news anchor on KWWL and KCRG, she is the familiar face and voice who delivered news to thousands of Eastern Iowans for years.
Liz Mathis is a household name!
And all of us must do everything we can to help her get elected…
A second email from the group with the subject line “premature adulation,” noted that nothing is official until the convention. Mathis has not returned my phone calls.
When word of Dandekar’s departure broke, one of the first names I thought of was Linn County Supervisor Brent Oleson, who represents much of Senate 18, including Marion, and was chief of staff to Mary Lundby, who represented Marion in the state senate for 14 years.
But Oleson said he was contacted by several Republican leaders/activists in Des Moines who informed him in no uncertain terms that his candidacy would not be warmly received. Do not run was the message. He didn’t name names.
“They said I wouldn’t get past the convention because of my support for (Project Labor Agreements) and the marriage amendment issue,” Oleson said. “They want someone without a record.”
Oleson played a key role in putting together project labor agreements with the intention of making sure the maximum number of local workers got jobs on numerous post-flood county public works projects, in then midst of a recession. And he’s signed on with former Sen. Jeff Angelo’s effort to organize Republicans who support legal gay marriage.
So he reached out to work with unions and doesn’t think the state should deny civil marriage rights to thousands of its citizens. And for that dual deficiency in his required daily allowance of today’s GOP ideological purity, he need not apply for the Senate seat, even though he’d have an excellent chance of putting it in the R column. (Although I’m not sure why he’d want to leave a good gig to go to the Legislature.)
Never mind that the slice of electoral geography in question has now been represented by moderates for 16-plus years, first by Lundby and then by Dandekar. Turning away from that winning formula in this narrowly divided but independent leaning district would be a mistake for either party. Republicans are giving early signs of such a rightward turn. But we’ll start learning a lot more about the candidates and where they stand soon.
UPDATE –Former U.S. Attorney Matt Dummermuth has now thrown his hat into the GOP contest.
Here’s his news release:
Robins resident and former U.S. Attorney Matt Dummermuth announces candidacy for open Iowa Senate Seat
ROBINS – Former United States Attorney and current small businessman Matt Dummermuth today announced his candidacy for the Republican nomination for Iowa Senate District 18. The seat is open as a result of the recent resignation of Senator Swati Dandekar. Her remaining one-year term will be filled in a special election on November 8.
“Now more than ever, Iowa needs genuine leaders who are not afraid to think outside the box and tackle tough issues in a principled, conservative manner,” Dummermuth said. “I want to use my extensive government experience and small business background to help Iowa become an even better place to grow a business, find a job and raise a family. The state should help foster such an environment by effectively and efficiently carrying out its essential responsibilities, limiting the reach and size of government beyond its core functions, and protecting Iowans’ economic, political and religious liberties in the process.”
Dummermuth’s small business experience involves starting a new law office and practice, along with active involvement since childhood in his family’s farming business. His government experience includes stints in public service in all three branches of the federal government and in Iowa’s executive and legislative branches. His most recent public service was as U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Iowa from 2007 to 2009, leading an office of 60 employees, including 26 attorneys in prosecuting federal crimes and handling civil matters in the District, which includes Linn County.
“In today’s uncertain economic climate and hyper-partisan political atmosphere, the state would benefit by having more elected officials who are effective problem-solvers focused on creating a stable and sustainable government, rather than those who excel at ratcheting up rhetoric, making empty promises, and attacking opponents, Dummermuth said.”
Dummermuth is an Iowa native who resides in Robins with his wife and three young kids. He earned his B.S. in engineering at Iowa State University and his J.D. at Harvard Law School. He practices law in Cedar Rapids as a partner with the law firm of Whitaker Hagenow GBMG.
UPDATE II — Mathis is now formally in. Her news release:
Liz Mathis: I’m ready to go to work for the people of Senate District 18
Liz Mathis announced today that she will seek the Democratic nomination for Iowa Senate District 18 in the upcoming special election to fill the seat vacated by Sen. Swati Dandekar of Marion.
“People all over are trying to get back on their feet from this lingering national recession,” Mathis said. “They need jobs and they need stability for their families, and all we’re getting from our government is gridlock. It must change. I pledge to work with Democratic and Republican legislators and Governor Branstad to make a difference for the people in District 18.”
Mathis added: “We need new policies that will help our Main Street businesses thrive, bring in business and spur job growth in our local communities. My husband and I have experienced that first-hand in our family’s business. That’s one of many reasons I’m running. We also need to stop short-changing our educational system and we need to address support of our area’s most vulnerable children who are affected by poverty and neglect. I am passionate about those things.”
Mathis currently works for a child welfare and juvenile justice agency, Four Oaks, and its affiliates, the Affordable Housing Network and Iowa KidsNet. She is Chief Information Officer, overseeing legislative advocacy, public relations, marketing and development. Mathis currently is an Ohnward Bank Board Director with branches in Marion and Cedar Rapids and sits on the Wartburg College Board of Regents.
Mathis was a news anchor, reporter and producer at KCRG-TV from 1998 to 2007. Prior to KCRG, Mathis spent 16 years at KWWL-TV in Waterloo, where she was an executive producer and first female co-anchor of the evening news. She also taught communication studies and first amendment law at Wartburg College from 1996-1998.
Mathis and her husband, Mark, who owns the advertising agency ME&V, live near Robins and have two children. She grew up on a farm in rural Iowa and is a University of Iowa graduate.
“I’ve spent my professional career in the communications business,” Mathis said. “I’ve listened to a lot of people in our community tell their stories. I love helping people connect and making things happen. My campaign will focus on reaching out to as many people as I can in Senate District 18. I’m going to knock on doors, meet them and hear what they have to say. I’m running to represent the people of Senate District 18 and I’m ready to go to work for them.”
HA! Dorman…if you believe that schlock from Olson…I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
The reason why Olson isn’t naming names is because what he’s feeding you is a line of hooey.
My republican sources are telling me the same thing., Todd. As much as some folks would like to see some sanity return to the GOP leadership, sadly this just isn’t the time. Theo-fundi-nutters and big biz have colluded to push the party to the radical right.
Many independent, centrist, and moderate Dems could easily vote for a Mary Lundby. Brent Olson is cut from similar cloth. Lincoln couldn’t even get nominated by what the TeaOP has morphed into.
“My republican sources”
Harumph, Joe, you need to be more selective about who you hang out with…
Tell me Joe, how many Tea Party rallies have you been to? How many Tea Party members have you taled to? Or do you get your thoughts on the subject by the official press releases of the Prgressive Ministry of Thought
Control?
I’ve been to a few, Dan. I’ve talked to many. Unlike some folks, I generally don’t talk about things of which I know nothing.
OK, Todd, so you’re saying he could be nominated? Because basically, the issue here is whether an electable, moderate GOP candidate in the mold of the district’s longtime popular senator, Mary Lundby,could get the party nod to run for the seat. And regardless of who did or did not talk to him, the answer seems to be no.
Todd,
In order to get the “party nod” to be the candidate in this special election, you must win the nomination at the Special Nomination Convention from the GOP delegates who represented Senate District 18.
Senate District 18 is in the heart of Oleson’s base of support–Marion.
If he can’t get the support of people in his own party..from his OWN community, Todd–then Oleson has bigger problems than what some supposed “GOP activist/leader in Des Moines” is supposedly saying.
Party leaders in Des Moines aren’t going to be the ones picking the candidate…its going to be rank and file GOP members from Senate District 18.
Who are you referring to Todd D? “the district’s longtime popular senator, Mary Lundby” Not in my book, I emailed Lundby on a local matter, (Lake MacBride motor regulations) to which she objected on the basis of “waterskiing, and PWC’s. Neither of them were ever a part of that issue. Uninformed and wrong, Lundy based her votes or non-votes on misinformation. You say we need someone just like her, we have too many of those already!
I see our local expert on GOP politics is being coy. Todd Johnson, YOU spill the beans: what do you know about Brent Oleson and why he was discouraged from running?
I can see why Oleson would be scary to the GOP nomenklatura: he has dangerous Triotskyist tendencies which the GOP Stalinists cannot tolerate.
The horror! Working with labor unions, and working to preserve the civil rights of gays and lesbians: definitely not in conformity to the totalitarian ideology of the modern GOP.
Jeff,
If this schlock that Oleson is giving is why he isn’t running..then why doesn’t he have the GUTS to name names. Tell everyone who told him “not to run”.
The fact of the matter is he never had ANY conversation with “GOP leaders/activists in Des Moines”.
This is merely his convenient excuse to make himself look like the poor persecuted moderate he wants everyone to keep believing he is.
And by comment 3 we have Trotsky, Stalin and totalitarian references. Good to see all is progressing normally today in Commentistan.
It could have been worse, Todd. I could have referenced Erhard Milch and Willy Messerschmitt…
You are right: bashing internal GOP dissidents isn’t a recent phenomenon.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,942320,00.html
“Good to see all is progressing normally today in Commentistan.”
Nice one Todd. I might had used “smearistan” but appreciate the thought – thanks.
“I don’t see any benefit in a contest between a number of people that might weaken a prime candidate,” said Diane Hoffmann of Mount Vernon, the Linn County Democratic Party chairwoman.
She declined to identify the candidates the party is considering.”
http://thegazette.com/2011/09/19/parties-racing-for-dandekar%E2%80%99s-open-seat/
Todd,
Are you planning to apply for any Sourcemedia TV news anchor opening and “tell us ’bout the plane crash with a gleam in your eye?” Nobody has closed the process for your attempt to run against Liz as a registered Republican.
No and no, although I’m confused by that plane crash reference. And I am not a member of either party and have no plans to join anytime soon. It also so happens that I am the perfect combination of no interest whatsoever in running for anything and no chance whatsoever of being elected to anything.
http://www.lyricsfreak.com/d/don+henley/dirty+laundry_20042033.html
Rock & Roll critiques television Journalism.
Oh, of course. Sorry for my lyrical ignorance.
Todd,
Why no criticism of the behind closed doors nonsense the Democrats are using to put their nominee forward?
Aren’t you folks in the media supposed to be all about transparency and openness? The Democrats and labor unions met behind closed doors to select their candidate.
Doesn’t that bother you at all that the people who actually LIVE in Senate District 18 won’t have a say as to who their candidate is? Instead, they’re getting a candidate force fed to them.
There’s a lot jockeying going on behind the scenes on both sides. These special election picks are by their nature insider party proceedings, not popular elections. I don’t think the Democrats should exclude anyone who wants to seek the nomination. So if they are, I think that’s a mistake. But I also know that the Republican process isn’t as purely local and grassroots as its being portrayed. The stakes are too high to believe that party leaders and interests from outside D18 aren’t weighing in. This election has statewide implications. And in the end, the candidates will be judged more on their experience and stands on the issues, not the process through which they were picked.
Todd,
Yes, there are GOP candidates for Senate 18 whom are garnering the support of GOP leaders outside of the district, but when the Special Nomination Convention is held…the floor WILL be open to any and all people to be put in nomination for the seat.
The GOP delegates from Senate 18 will have a CHOICE as to who represents them in this special election.
The Democrats are already on record saying they will have an “uncontested” nomination.
They’re also on record saying that party leaders were meeting with labor union leaders to “vette” a candidate.
Meaning–if you’re not approved by the party and the union–you’re shut out of the process. That’s bad for openness and transparency, Todd and you know it.
What’s funny here, Mr. Johnson (I use the formality since there are two “Todds” here), is that you, as a Republican, are kvetching about the Democrat process, while I, as an independent with no connections with the GOP, is griping about the Republican process.
See the ironies? We’re both griping about the other side of the fence. We’re pretending these aren’t two business parties, working to either protect or expand their turfs. And, NEITHER party is using an open, inclusive, democratic process: both are subject to the demands of the party machinery.
Now be careful: do I have to invoke Nixon and Agnew AGAIN!?
I agree with a desire for openness and transparency. And, again, I think Democrats should allow anyone who wants to run to seek the nomination. But the truth is even the conventions represent only a tiny sliver of the 51,000 voters in the district There are 48 potential district delegates on the GOP side, for example. So this is not exactly a highly inclusive electoral process on either side of the aisle.
I think the irony here is Klinzman, our devout PHD’er in English who said:
“I,——————, is griping about the Republican process.”
Yes Jeffy, you is!
Oleson probably does not want to leave his pocket lining position with the county.
My vote goes to whichever candidate promises to slash their pay and all state level elected official by 50% or more
the best part of this story is that the Democrat candidate is being select not because of her qualification but because she was on TV… that is the funniest thing I have ever heard. I guess when you cant win on ideas, you have resort to this.
oh and joe lieberman called and said that the GOP is not the only party that is ditching moderates….
Never mind Mathis’ work at Four Oaks, or her connections with the local business community. You contend Mathis is an empty talking head with no ideas because you won’t bother to actually LISTEN to her.
Jeremy, if someone who favored the Democrats wrote something like this about Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann, you’d be up in arms.
Jeff,
Mathis is the “Chief Information Officer” for Four Oaks..in other words…she’s the “talking head” for that organization.
Here’s the question you should ask Jeff…just WHAT has Liz Mathis done in the public policy arena? What leadership in the community has she provided?
Did you bother reading the stories, Todd? The answer is there for you to find.
Of course, ANY Republican is qualified in your eyes, just by virtue of being a Republican…
No, Jeff… Of the Republican candidates that are running, there are candidates whom I feel are more qualified than others.
Nice that you can’t answer my question Jeff…so I’ll ask it again.. WHAT has Liz Mathis done in the public policy arena? What leadership has she provided in the community?
You don’t have to like it, but from the story above:
“Mathis currently works for a child welfare and juvenile justice agency, Four Oaks, and its affiliates, the Affordable Housing Network and Iowa KidsNet. She is Chief Information Officer, overseeing legislative advocacy, public relations, marketing and development. Mathis currently is an Ohnward Bank Board Director with branches in Marion and Cedar Rapids and sits on the Wartburg College Board of Regents.
“Mathis was a news anchor, reporter and producer at KCRG-TV from 1998 to 2007. Prior to KCRG, Mathis spent 16 years at KWWL-TV in Waterloo, where she was an executive producer and first female co-anchor of the evening news. She also taught communication studies and first amendment law at Wartburg College from 1996-1998.
“Mathis and her husband, Mark, who owns the advertising agency ME&V, live near Robins and have two children. She grew up on a farm in rural Iowa and is a University of Iowa graduate.”
Mathis has credentials, Todd.
Jeff,
Nice regurgitation of a press release there.
Again..ANSWER the question… WHAT has Liz Mathis done in the public policy process? What policies has she advocated for or against?
Where does she stand??
Liz has a perspective of history from reporting the news for many years. Sarah Palin was a sports “reporter”. Well, she had access to athletes anyway.
I would suggest that neither Democratic or Republican “talent” selected to run, or thought capable of winning, best represent the voters, but more what the party structure would want. I can not see that either side has been doing such a bang up job at the statehouse of late. Suggesting someone who is able to think for themselves, represent their people on the ground, and do it in such a way that preserves job opportunity locally at decent wages? Why of course not! What a stupid idea!
“the conventions represent only a tiny sliver of the 51,000 voters in the district There are 48 potential district delegates on the GOP side, for example. So this is not exactly a highly inclusive electoral process on either side of the aisle.”
Delegates chosen at their Precinct Caucuses by their neighbors to represent them NOT by the Party Leadership.
Direct Democracy is the only form you approve of?? I suppose we should replace Congress with a National Town Hall??
PS the votes of the Delegates will be weighted according to the votes cast for
Republicans in the last election.
The decisions are going to be made one step removed from the indivicual voter on the local level and not by the Party leadership pretty grassroots if you ask me Unlike the smole filled backroom method of the other Party
What happens in the “smoke filled backroom” (you’ve gotta be talking about Repubs – Dems certainly wouldn’t allow smoking!) is a process common to all parties. Stakeholders gather to discuss pros and cons of a wide variety of folks who have shown interest in a particular office, of folks who might be encouraged to participate. This is called “vetting”.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vetting) Parties vet potential candidates. This is nothing new, nor is it news.
I know the process from the Dem side because I’m directly involved in the process. No candidate was chosen to the exclusion of all others. One candidate expressed interest, no others have (as of yet), and no one in the room thought the one candidate was a bad fit. Next Wednesday, the Central Committee members from SD-18 will vote for the candidate of their choice. As of this moment, only one person has declared their candidacy. Should others choose to run, that’s fine. It’s allowed by the rules, and nothing prevents them from running.
Hopefully, this corrects your misconceptions of how the process works, Dan.
Joe,
Quite honestly…that’s a bunch of BS and you know it.
The Linn County Democratic Party chair has already stated ON THE RECORD in the Gazette and elsewhere that the Democrats were going to have an “uncontested” nomination.
They also stated ON THE RECORD that they were meeting behind CLOSED DOORS to “vette” a suitable candidate–meaning–NO openness, NO transparency.
Anyone who might show “interest” in this seat…is being told by the Linn County Democrats and the Iowa Democratic Party NOT to run.
In comparision Joe…the Republicans are holding an OPEN nomination convention where anyone who wishes to place their name into nomination may do so.
The selection of the candidate will be made by delegates of Senate District 18…not by party pooh-bahs with their union accomplices behind closed doors.
Again, you couldn’t be more wrong. So far, the Dems race is uncontested. Of course party officials and other stakeholders met to vet and discuss the situation. The repubs did the same thing, whether in person or via telephone. I have not been told by anyone “NOT to run”, and I did consider running.
Had you done any research, you’d know that I am the Secretary of the Linn County Democrats. I know what the rules are, what the law requires, what has happened thus far, and how the process will go next week. I have to, it’s my job as the Secretary – a duly elected officer – of the party.
Talk all the smack you want, spin the quotes all you want. One of us knows exactly what we’re talking about, the other one of us is you. #A55HAT .
BTW, my comments here are my own, and not to be construed as any official statement of the party nor endorsed by the party. Indeed, I’m sure I’ll catch some flack from folks for posting my position, although anyone with the ability to use Google could easily figure it out.
Just so you know, I only mention my position with the party so that you, Todd, will perhaps understand that I’m not just blowing smoke out of my backside. Now, care to inform us of your credentials?
So you’re really going to sit there..and try to pass off what you’re saying as truth??
That’s absolutely hilarious considering the Linn County Democratic Chair is ON THE RECORD stating exactly what I pointed out.
Mr. Stutler..you can keep on blathering on nonsense.. you’re only making yourself and your party look like a bunch of fools.
The Democrats have stated DIRECTLY in the media that they were picking out their candidate behind closed doors and that they were going to have an uncontested nomination.
Anyone else who might have been interested in the Democratic nomination has been told in no uncertain terms not to run–Liz Mathis has already been selected by the the state and county Democratic officials to be their candidate.
The “nomination” convention that the Democrats will hold is nothing more than formality. The selection has already been made. The delegates from Senate 18 for the Democratic Party will have NO say as to who their candidate is. That choice has already been made for them.
Last pass on this, Todd. Folks that know me know I don’t necessarily tow the line, spout the party drivel, or even remain silent when I see the party violating it’s own rules. Folks that know me know I called out Roxy on her lack of support for the party platform (and I damned sure didn’t vote for her, but I did vote for a democrat), and know that I have in the past publicly – in the media – called for a state party chair’s resignation when I believed him to be playing fast and loose with the rules and ideals of the party. I’d give you links, but you continue to prove that you are not smart enough to click on ‘em and understand what you’re reading.
In short, you couldn’t be more wrong about me, about what I’m telling you regarding how our party operates, and about your assertions. I find you to be both ignorant and stupid, both unknowing of the facts and simultaneously unable to learn from facts.I base this on observation – you continue to rant away despite being corrected repeatedly It seems you may be coproencephalic. Do seek help. You are one of the rare exceptions that tell me I voted wrong on the Constitutional Amendment item on the 2008 ballot. Yep, because of me, and many who voted as I did, you get to vote. #ID10T.
Todd, you asked above for Mathis’ platform before the campaign has even begun. I could just as easily turn that around by asking for detailed platforim proposals from your Republican candidate. And, you overlook her work on the Wartburg Board of Regents and Ohnward Bank. Her husband, Mark, has been a businessman for decades. Methinks you would sing a very different tune if she had announced on the GOP side.
Second, as I’ve noted before, you will use anything you can against the Democrats, but we could certainly talk about the Iowa GOP pulling “Double-Dip Terry” out of retirement: how “open” was that process? You keep quoting the Linn County Democrat chair, without ever once even listening to what Joe has said above: that Mathis may very well have been the ONE person who expressed an interest in running, which was why the race was “uncontested.” Don’t gripe about the mote in the Democrat eye while ignoring the beam in the GOP’s.
Finally, a “Vette” has eight cylinders, rear drive, and will smoke its tires. You “vet” a person when you review their suitability.
You’re welcome…
“Mathis has credentials, Todd.”
Yeah, she has “press” credentials which automatically disqualified her as biased and not objective.
Her press credentials automatically disqualify Mathis as biased and not objective!?!?
Gary, your definition of “objective” is any perspective which conforms to yours. Be honest with us: you are incapable of being fair to anyone running as a Democrat.
“but we could certainly talk about the Iowa GOP pulling “Double-Dip Terry” out of retirement: how “open” was that process? ” Pretty open I’d say it was called a primary.