





Three Iowa civil rights investigators have been fired after sending hundreds of gossipy emails calling co-workers derogatory nicknames like “Psycho,” ”Monster,” and “Roid Rage,” and forwarding pictures that made fun of fat people, Wal-Mart customers and others, according to public records and interviews.
Tiffanie Drayton, Michele Howard and Wendy Buenger repeatedly used mocking nicknames for many of their colleagues at the Iowa Civil Rights Commission in e-mails they sent throughout the workday, according to copies obtained by The Associated Press under the public records law.
They called their supervisor, Don Grove, “Teen Wolf” and the commission’s executive director Beth Townsend, “Night Ranger,” as they gossiped about their management styles. They criticized colleagues’ looks, social skills and mannerisms, quoted vulgar rap lyrics and received and sent offensive pictures — all while they were supposed to be investigating complaints of housing and employment discrimination.
“Dude Where’s My Car and Psycho are talking about food — a match made in stoner/fatty heaven!” Drayton wrote to the other two on March 4 in one of many such examples.
The emails were submitted as evidence in recent legal proceedings in which Drayton, Howard and Buenger have sought unemployment benefits after their firings on June 16. The AP obtained them from Iowa Workforce Development, along with audio recordings of hearings for Drayton and Howard and decisions denying them benefits.
Townsend, also called “Sarg” in some messages, discovered the trove of emails during an unrelated investigation into the alleged release of confidential information. She told AP she fired them after an internal investigation, which found Drayton alone sent an average of 75 personal emails per day from March 1 until June 3.
Meanwhile, Drayton finished only one civil rights investigation during the same timeframe — a pace of work seen as slower than usual but satisfactory, according to Grove’s testimony. Howard sent 1,600 emails during the same timeframe, almost none of them work-related.
“I discovered that she had been sending these profane, obscene, vulgar, inappropriate emails as well as emails between her and two other staff members that were harassing to their peers and their management,” Townsend testified Aug. 5 at Drayton’s hearing. “They had assigned nicknames for everybody in the agency that included ‘Monster,’ ‘Psycho,’ stoned intern, ‘Roid Rage,’ ‘Rainman,” ‘Extreme Makeover,’ ‘Homeless McGree,’ ‘albino.’ They referred to myself as ‘Night Ranger.’ They referred to their supervisor as ‘Teen Wolf.’”
She said the emails were so frequent, they likely took up a majority of Drayton’s workday.
Drayton acknowledged during the hearing that the emails were inappropriate and unprofessional but said they weren’t harassing because other employees didn’t know they were being talked about. She dismissed warnings from her supervisors they could end up in the local newspaper because they were public records.
“Were any of the emails published or received by the Des Moines Register at any point?” she asked Townsend in a cross-examination. “They have not to date,” Townsend responded.
Drayton expressed shock after learning Friday that the AP had obtained the emails. Then she downplayed them. She noted that she was appealing her firing by filing a union grievance, which is still pending.
“The majority of those emails were office banter between us. It was just talk, water cooler chat between the three of us,” she said. She said she didn’t want to comment further because, while she might disagree with the commission’s leaders, “I ultimately agree with the mission of the agency and don’t want to do anything that’s going to hurt the agency.”
Howard testified Aug. 4 that everyone at the agency used email for non-work purposes and downplayed the emails as “just the girls being silly.” She explained the three nicknamed Grove after seeing a movie called “Teen Wolf.”
“He had a beard and he kind of reminded us of a younger version of Mr. Grove,” she said.
Listed phone numbers for Buenger and Howard couldn’t be found, and their union steward declined to comment. Buenger’s unemployment case will be heard next month.
All three earned $41,800 per year at the commission, which enforces Iowa’s anti-discrimination law by investigating and trying to resolve discrimination complaints and providing public education. Townsend said the agency has 17 other civil rights investigators and is trying to minimize the impact of the firings.
An email policy adopted March 1 after Gov. Terry Branstad appointed Townsend to lead the commission advises employees to limit use to business “to the greatest extent possible” and not to send messages that are offensive, pornographic, political, chain letters or harassing. The policy also gave Townsend greater ability to fire employees for misconduct.
Judges have denied Drayton and Howard unemployment, saying they committed misconduct and therefore aren’t eligible for benefits.
“While employed by an agency whose purpose is to confront, remedy and eliminate discrimination, Ms. Howard engaged in a remarkably broad, persistent campaign of discrimination and otherwise offensive conduct through her abuse of the employer’s electronic communication system,” Administrative Law Judge James Timberland wrote Aug. 15. “What is even more remarkable is Ms. Howard’s effort to minimize, or excuse away, the discrimination and offensive conduct she directed at various individuals and groups.”
Timberland said Howard traded and received emails “that made fun of and/or ridiculed obese people, gay, transgendered and/or transvestite people, elderly people, Walmart customers, African-American men, white high school students, white men, and white people generally.”
Drayton, who had worked at the commission since 2007, reveled in emails she thought were funny. She told two friends outside the agency on March 30 that the messages “were the highlight of my work week.”
On May 27, she added: “I get some pretty hilarious e-mails and have strange conversations that I believe would make an excellent coffee table book.”
Here are some excerpts of hundreds of inappropriate emails sent by fired Iowa Civil Rights Commission investigators Tiffanie Drayton, Michele A. Howard and Wendy Buenger:
People ought to be judged by how well they do their actual jobs, not by water cooler conversations or humorous emails. Camaraderie is a good thing in a stale workplace. Civilized behavior is just a shallow veneer we use to get along with each other. Those who posture themselves as more ‘civilized’ are not necessarily the best employees. Beware the humorless workplace!
Except Gary, a work email system is NOT the place to have a personal conversation. I agree with the sentiment that it is not harassing as the subjects of said emails weren’t aware of their existence until they were made public in the investigation. Insulting yes, harassing no.
More than anything else, these three women are lacking in commen sense.
I’ll have to disagree with Gary above. Individual email excerpts show me three young women who were grossly unprofessional in their work conduct; the volume of emails makes me wonder how much actual work they did. How effective could these women have been in their jobs if they are so obviously prejudiced, and express those prejudices while on the clock? And, while I will never advocate the employer’s power, by doing this stuff on Civil Rights Commission email accounts, the young women left themselves open to exposure and termination. No wonder one of the young women was so horrified at the thought of these emails entering the public domain.
The foolproof guide? “Act like everyhting you say or write will eventually be heard by your mother.”
..and for those wags out there, my mom isn’t easily shocked…
I think the Civil Rights Commission was right to terminate them, and the Union should agree with them. Unemployment benifts will not be won here.
Seems the bosses were a little up tight about their nicknames. Going to be a boss, you shouldn’t have thin skin. The girls should of known the emails were subject to be seen by their bosses though. Should of had better nicks for them.
These days, this kind of activity regardless of content will get you terminated from many jobs. Non-business use of business owned computers is unacceptable.
I dont think there’s any question that these employees should have been terminated just on the basis of improper use of state resources (ie personal emails) that were taking up the majority of their day.
Apparently there must not be enough work for them to do in the course of a day, so perhaps serious consideration should be given to reducing the amount of staffing there.
Taxpayers shouldn’t be paying for people to sit around and send snarky emails back and forth to each other all day.
They’re there to do a job. If there’s not work for them to do, then the positions obviously are not needed.
Your tax dollars at work.
First time I ever agreed with Todd. Total idiots all. Ever heard of gmail, ladies?