Video of Iowa State football coach Paul Rhoads talking about his 2011 team is at the end of this post.
CEDAR RAPIDS — Eleven months ago, the Big 12 Conference was crumbling in a landslide.
Nebraska made a move east to the Big Ten. Colorado made a move west to the Pac-10. And the middle was no longer terra firma, not with at least five of the six South Division members getting romanced intensely by the Pac-10.
Iowa State appeared to be headed to college athletics limbo, in danger of needing a lesser conference with lesser means for shelter, but not a whole lot more.

Bob Brooks and Paul Rhoads (Mike Hlas photo)
But here we are in May 2011. Texas decided it was better to be the kings of the Big 12 than an equal partner in the Pac-16, and the rest of the Big 12’s southwest membership stayed put, too.
Somehow, Big 12 Commissioner Dan Beebe not only kept the 10 holdovers together, but got the big-money television contract he promised he’d get when he convinced Texas and friends the grass was plenty green right where they were.
Last month, the Big 12 signed a 13-year deal with Fox Sports Media Group that’s worth $90 million annually, up from the $20 million the league had with the company. That’s accompanied by the $60 million annual revenue the conference was already getting from ESPN for first-tier football rights.
Remember those dark days of worrying about going to the Mountain West or worse, Cyclone fans? It was like Y2K. A lot of noisy fears suddenly were stilled when nothing bad actually happened.
“You could have argued that maybe things were on life-support and there were people worrying about what the future held,” Iowa State Athletic Director Jamie Pollard said Wednesday night at the Cyclone Tailgate Tour stop at the U.S. Cellular Center. “Here we are a year later and we’re in the Big 12, the Big 12 is still called the Big 12.
“We have a television deal that is monumental and really solidifies not only the togetherness of the 10 institutions, but our financial future. So I would say things are really, really good.”
Pollard said the Fox deal will mean at least another $4 million a year in television revenue for Iowa State. “Which is significant,” he said, “especially given the fact that we’ve weaned ourselves from state support.”
The TV deal isn’t charity, however. The Cyclones and fellow league members will march to the networks’ orders. ISU’s football schedule this season is proof.

A bearded Rhodes (Mike Hlas photo)
Iowa State has a pair of Friday night ESPN games, Sept. 16 at Connecticut, and Nov. 18 in Ames against Oklahoma State. Instead of playing 12 games in 12 weeks, the Cyclones will have two bye weeks. They will play Nov. 26 at Oklahoma and Dec. 3 at Kansas State.
“You can’t do anything about it,” said ISU football coach Paul Rhoads. “There’s just so much money involved there, television contracts and the exposure that goes along with them. Television’s going to dictate the length of the schedule and, at certain times, when we’re going to play.”
The Friday night games might not be part of a perfect world, but Pollard said “To know going in that we’re already on (ESPN) two times, that’s twice as much as we’ve been on in the last five years. And we know we’ll be on some other national telecasts because of our agreement with Fox, on FX.”
No, losing Nebraska and Colorado as partners wasn’t great. But staying in your old league and getting a lot more TV money is pretty good salve for those wounds.
“I don’t think anybody could have predicted a year ago we’d be where we are today,” Pollard said.
On Oct. 1, it won’t be New Mexico or Wyoming or UNLV of the Mountain West bringing its football team to Jack Trice Stadium for Iowa State’s conference-opener. That will be Texas. You know, a team Cyclone fans actually want to see in the league that wouldn’t die.
No title game, though, and that is going to hurt.
Why is this conference still called the “Big 12″? Shouldn’t it be the “Hooray for Texas, to hell with everyone else” conference? Let’s see, $90 million new contract minus $20 million old contract=$70 million more for ten schools …. Wait a second! Why is Iowa State University only getting 4 million more?
As for Paul Davis’s comment, why should ISU care? They will never play in that game during his or his children’s life times.
I am still really shocked that the Big 12 didn’t try to attract TCU and/or Boise St. TCU probably wanted the least amount of competitiion from an automatic qualifying conference in the Big East but why wouldn’t Boise St. and the Big 12 try to work something out? From there they could try to get someone like SMU or another smaller relatively respectible school (aside from SMU’s early 80′s antics).
Outside of football – and football in a weak conference – TCU, Boise St. and SMU have little to offer a BCS conference. HOWEVER, the Big East doesn’t care because their football quality is terrible right now and TCU helps their image immediately – regardless of the rest of the sports programs.
If the Big XII were ever to expand back to 12, I can guarantee you it wouldn’t include any of the most likely candidates – Houston, TCU, SMU, Rice – from the state of Texas, as the Univerity of Texas would block that move. The last thing UT wants is to build up another in-state school to be a rival in terms of prestige and recruiting; heck, they didn’t even want Baylor or Texas Tech to come with them from the SWC when the Big XII was formed.
Anyone who believes that the Big 12′s current stability will become long-term isn’t too bright. Just watch – towards the end of the TV contracts Texas will start to be wooed by other conferences – not “actively seeking conference – and the whole wheel will start turning again. That’s just the type of school Texas is – strong academically and athletically, and not afraid to use it against others!
do you guys even know what your talking about? clearly you don’t.. very well
———-
AJS – TCU and BSU has trouble selling out their home stadiums ( unless you use the Goofy math like BSU uses, where they have 120% for some game due to them not counting their Expansion just yet… even still they average less that 100% of less than 34k..FACT!)
BSU brings a godawful academic school and lil else
TCU brings a market that the B-12 already owns
————-
Mike M- Look Texas got what they wanted. They will make around 30 million + in the end. no way Texas goes anywhere. If you want to talk about schools that might leave ok.
1st- ND has to go to the B1G( don’t ask me where the B1G gets a second school to get to 14 IDK!)
2nd- the SEC wants to add a 13th and 14th school
3rd- the SEC gets OU and OSU to join the SEC
with out 1,2, or 3 the B-12 lives forever.
If you don’t love Bob Brooks then you don’t love Iowa athletics!
Texas can leave any time it wants to. they are Texas..if there is money to be made and they can get a sweeter deal from someone else, they will pay the fine and be 3 sheets to the wind.
as for Iowa State, I’d rather be ‘orphaned’ than be the red-headed step-child to Iowa any day….
Mr.Hlas
the one fear I have of ISU is that they will make the Iowa/ISU game their “Bowl” game this year. I Think that game might well be more dangerous than the Pitt/Iowa game.. thoughts?
I agree with those who say Texas isn’t going anywhere. It had its chance. It looked seriously at joining the Pac-10. And it realized it was best off staying put where it could assemble its own TV network, be king of the hill, and stay in the league that makes the most geographic sense for it.
Things won’t stay the way they are forever (they never do), but I look for the current conference lineups in the BCS conferences to stay the way they are for a few years, at least. The next shift will probably be the big one, when true super conferences are formed.