Iowa’s Ricky Stanzi will probably have one of the 96 quarterback jobs in the 2011 NFL season. If there’s an NFL season. Which there will be, though it may be a shortened version.
However, that doesn’t mean Everybody Loves Ricky.
Russ Lande of The Sporting News was pretty blunt about how he viewed Stanzi’s performance Sunday at the NFL Combine. In this article with Lande’s assessment of how quarterbacks, receivers and running backs performed in Indianapolis Sunday, he wrote:
After (Cam) Newton sailed passes high, Stanzi stepped up and threw passes into the ground in front of his receivers. Stanzi had a poor week at the Senior Bowl and was equally unimpressive Sunday. He simply lacks athletic skills and accuracy.

Ricky Stanzi (AP photo)
Lande wasn’t too high on Wisconsin RB John Clay, either, saying Clay was “outclassed by his peers.”
Adam Caplan of FoxSports.com watched all of the 16 quarterbacks who threw passes at the Combine on Sunday. Missouri’s Blaine Gabbert opted not to throw Sunday.
Caplan ranked Stanzi 13th, saying the following in this article:
Stanzi’s performance was disappointing from an overall standpoint because he tended to aim the ball on many of his throws. He didn’t look like a natural thrower, which is a little bit of a surprise. He had better touch on his shorter passes. But I’ll say this about him: He looks much better on tape. He also performed much better during Senior Bowl-week practices.
Stanzi didn’t play too badly in the Senior Bowl itself, either.
Alfie Crow of Jacksonville Jaguars blog Bigcatcountry.com (love the names, both “bigcatcountry” and “Alfie Crow”) agreed with Caplan about Stanzi’s performance on Sunday. Crow wrote:

Stanzi
Stanzi was rather disappointing in his passing drills. I’m not even going to mention his abysmal 40-yard dash time, because he was never seen as a quarterback who’d beat you with his legs. Passing however, has been his strong point. Stanzi seemed to aim his passes in the drills rather than anticipate where the receiver was going.
Something called xtrapointfootball.com followed the same theme in this story. An excerpt:
NFL Scout and Xtra Point Football’s Jayson Braddock said it best when he told me that Stanzi looked “like he couldn’t hit a barn” on Sunday. Known for his football IQ and his accuracy during games, it’s hard to predict how much of an impact Stanzi’s performance at the Combine will have on his stock, but it didn’t help him.
For a slant that understandably is Stanzi-friendly, here’s a piece by Jeff Schudel of the News-Herald in northern Ohio, from where Stanzi grew up. A video is included.
Finally, this Boston Herald Combine notebook by Ian Rapoport opens with Stanzi talking about working in California with quarterback guru Tom Martinez, who mentors New England Patriots’ QB Tom Brady.
What an idiot. If he was listening to the commentators he would have heard that the combine staff directed the qbs to throw to a spot in the field. Stanzi hit it most of the time. He did what others did not do according to the combine directions.
Yeah, that 68% career accuracy rating from2008-2010 is just a mirage and he can’t throw a lick. This is what happens when self-important blowhards get magazien credentials.
That should be “magazine”. Sorry
which is true, the spot or the receiver? what did the combine coaches say. i watched other QB’s and they pretty much put the ball right in the receivers hands.
Dennis,
NFL Network reporters were saying spot and actually showed orange cone along the sideline. They indicated qbs are suppose to throw to it in that particular drill.
We’ve watched Stanzi play for at least what, three years? I’ve watched every Hawk game during that time and there’s undoubtedly a tape somewhere for each. Though my opinion doesn’t matter, I don’t personally care what a guy does on one particular Sunday during drills. In game situations, I think Stanzi is very good and has NFL type skills. They’re always saying that you shouldn’t hold too much weight on how a guy does in shorts and no pads when he looks great; I’d say that same thing when he doesn’t look so great. And as far as speed, same thing. Watch the tape. Stanzi got out of a LOT of bad situations and made positive yardage with his feet. No speed demon, but watch game tape and I don’t care what a stop watch says.
Off the soap box.
Thanks for listening.
Is Stanzi better than Mark Vlasic? Yes. Vlasic, another former Hawk QB, had a long career in the pros with a few starts. There’s no reason Stanzi can’t do better than that which, at the end of the day, is nothing to sneeze at.
To veer off that, Dwight … Mark Vlasic may have been the most underrated quarterback in Iowa history. Had he not played behind Chuck Long, there’s no telling what kind of career he would have had. He was very good in the one season he did start after Long, and as you said, had a long NFL career.
And, let us never forget, he had a very nice beard
QB’s (or for that matter, any player) that sprouts a beard while playing has always puzzled me. Can’t imagine it being very comfortable with the chin strap and all but, for each his own 
http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback
Bill Parcells’ four rules for drafting a quarterback
Thursday, 11 March 2010
He must be a senior, because you need time and maturity to develop into a good professional quarterback.
He must be a graduate, because you want someone who takes his responsibilities seriously.
He must be a three-year starter, because you need to make sure his success wasn’t ephemeral and that he has lived as “the guy” for some period of time.
He must have at least 23 wins, because the big passing numbers must come in the context of winning games.
Blatant Homerism also notes that, of the seven quarterbacks to win a Super Bowl in the 2000s, five — Drew Brees, Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, Peyton Manning and Trent Dilfer — met all four requirements when drafted.
hmmm…can u say Miami Dolphins…
It wouldn’t stun me if Belichick drafted Stanzi, B & G. It wouldn’t be the worst thing for Stanzi, that’s for sure.
I think we need to stop pretending that Trent Dilfer had anything whatsoever to do with Baltimore winning that Super Bowl title. But your general point holds.